Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

The Optimization of Nitrogen Fertilization Regulates Crop Performance and Quality of Processing Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402)

Spyridon A. Petropoulos; Ângela Fernandes; Eustratios Xyrafis; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effect of various fertilization regimes on processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402) yield and quality by applying the following treatments: (i) control (C), (ii) conventional fertilizer (21-0-0, N-P-K) (CF), (iii) slow release nitrogen fertilizer 46-0-0 (SR), (iv) conventional fertilizer (21-0-0, N-P-K) + Zeolite (CFZ), and v) composted sheep manure (M). The results of the study showed that the SR and CFZ treatments resulted in the highest fruit yield per hectare compared to the rest of the fertilizer and the control treatments. Fruit firmness was higher for the treatments C, M and SR, while color parameters (chroma and hue angle) were higher for the C and M treatments, respectively. Moreover, the total soluble solids content (TSS; °Brix) was higher when manure (M) was applied. In terms of chemical composition, the total and individual tocopherols and sugars were the highest for the M and C treatments, respectively, whereas the oxalic, malic and total organic acid contents were the highest for the CFZ treatment. Moreover, the tested treatments showed a varied response in different antioxidant assays, although the M treatment exhibited a high antioxidant capacity in most of the assays, except for the β-carotene/linoleate assay. The carotenoid and chlorophyll contents were the highest for the control treatment. The main detected fatty acid was linoleic acid, followed by palmitic, oleic and α-linolenic acid, while the CFZ treatment had the highest content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) due to its high content of linoleic acid. In conclusion, although the application of fertilizers increased yield, the quality parameters and chemical composition showed a varied response to the fertilization regime, especially the TSS content and juice pH and electric conductivity (EC), which are significant for the marketability of the final product.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow release nitrogen fertilizer (SR) gave the highest fruit yield per hectare compared with the rest of the fertilizer and control treatments.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
slow release nitrogen fertilizer 46-0-0 (SR)e2
Outcome
fruit yield per hectaree1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
control treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of the study showed that the SR and CFZ treatments resulted in the highest fruit yield per hectare compared to the rest of the fertilizer and the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“slow release nitrogen fertilizer 46-0-0 (SR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional fertilizer with zeolite (CFZ) gave the highest fruit yield per hectare compared with the rest of the fertilizer and control treatments.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
conventional fertilizer (21-0-0, N-P-K) + Zeolite (CFZ)e2
Outcome
fruit yield per hectaree1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
control treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of the study showed that the SR and CFZ treatments resulted in the highest fruit yield per hectare compared to the rest of the fertilizer and the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“conventional fertilizer (21-0-0, N-P-K) + Zeolite (CFZ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness was higher for treatments C, M and SR.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
C, M and SRe3
Outcome
Fruit firmnesse3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit firmness was higher for the treatments C, M and SR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chroma was higher in the C treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
Ce4
Outcome
chromae4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“color parameters (chroma and hue angle) were higher for the C and M treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hue angle was higher in the M treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
Me4
Outcome
hue anglee4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“color parameters (chroma and hue angle) were higher for the C and M treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids content (°Brix) was higher when manure (M) was applied.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
manure (M)e5
Outcome
the total soluble solids content (TSS; °Brix)e5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“the total soluble solids content (TSS; °Brix) was higher when manure (M) was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total tocopherols were highest in the M treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
Me6
Outcome
total and individual tocopherolse6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total and individual tocopherols and sugars were the highest for the M and C treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugars were highest in the C treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
Ce6
Outcome
sugarse6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total and individual tocopherols and sugars were the highest for the M and C treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxalic, malic and total organic acid contents were highest in the CFZ treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
CFZ treatmente7
Outcome
oxalic, malic and total organic acid contentse7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e7

“the oxalic, malic and total organic acid contents were the highest for the CFZ treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M treatment showed a high antioxidant capacity in most assays, except the β-carotene/linoleate assay.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
Me1
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye1
Direction
highe1
Qualifier
in most of the assays, except for the β-carotene/linoleate assaye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“the M treatment exhibited a high antioxidant capacity in most of the assays, except for the β-carotene/linoleate assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid and chlorophyll contents were highest in the control treatment.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
control treatmente1
Outcome
carotenoid and chlorophyll contentse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The carotenoid and chlorophyll contents were the highest for the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1379 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linoleic acid was the main detected fatty acid in the processing tomato fruit.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Compound
linoleic acide1
Outcome
main detected fatty acide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main detected fatty acid was linoleic acid, followed by palmitic, oleic and α-linolenic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CFZ treatment had the highest content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, attributed to its linoleic acid content.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicume0
Material
Heinz 3402e0
Treatment
CFZ treatmente1
Compound
linoleic acide1
Outcome
polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Heinz 3402”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“the CFZ treatment had the highest content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) due to its high content of linoleic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1605 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

130 papers: 117 positive, 13 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.