Paper · 1990

The effect of LAB 173711 and ethephon on time of flowering and cold hardiness of peach flower buds.

Thomas J. Gianfagna

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Peach flowers are often killed during bloom by spring frosts. LAB 173711, a compound with abscisic (ABA)-like activity, and ethephon delayed flowering in peach trees. In greenhouse experiments, LAB 173711, at concentrations of 10−3–10−2 M, was most effective in delaying bloom when applied after a 5°C cold storage period, rather than before the dormancy breaking treatment. In contrast, ethephon delayed bloom most effectively when applied before 5°C cold storage; ethephon caused flower bud abscission when treatments were made after the chilling requirement had been satisfied. In field experiments, ethephon delayed flowering by 6–7 days, which reduced bud injury after a spring frost during bloom. No flower bud injury was found on ethephon-treated trees after temperatures of −4.3°C; whereas without ethephon 25% of the flower buds were frost damaged. LAB 173711 delayed the time to 50% bloom by 2–3 days. However, this was not long enough to avoid low-temperature injury to the flower buds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In field experiments ethephon delayed flowering of peach by 6-7 days.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
6–7 dayse0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field experiments, ethephon delayed flowering by 6–7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon-induced delay in flowering reduced flower bud injury after a spring frost during bloom in the field.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
bud injurye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon delayed flowering by 6–7 days, which reduced bud injury after a spring frost during bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No flower bud injury occurred on ethephon-treated peach trees after temperatures of -4.3 C, whereas without ethephon 25% of flower buds were frost damaged.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
flower bud injurye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Qualifier
25% of the flower buds were frost damagede0
Comparator
without ethephone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No flower bud injury was found on ethephon-treated trees after temperatures of −4.3°C; whereas without ethephon 25% of the flower buds were frost damaged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LAB 173711 delayed the time to 50% bloom of peach by 2-3 days.

Treatment
LAB 173711e0
Outcome
time to 50% bloome0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2–3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAB 173711 delayed the time to 50% bloom by 2–3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2-3 day delay in bloom from LAB 173711 was not long enough to avoid low-temperature injury to peach flower buds.

Treatment
LAB 173711e0
Outcome
low-temperature injury to the flower budse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAB 173711 delayed the time to 50% bloom by 2–3 days. However, this was not long enough to avoid low-temperature injury to the flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments LAB 173711 at 10-3 to 10-2 M was most effective in delaying bloom of peach when applied after a 5 C cold storage period rather than before the dormancy breaking treatment.

Treatment
LAB 173711e0
Outcome
delaying bloome0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
before the dormancy breaking treatmente0
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, LAB 173711, at concentrations of 10−3–10−2 M, was most effective in delaying bloom when applied after a 5°C cold storage period, rather than before the dormancy breaking treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon delayed bloom of peach most effectively when applied before 5 C cold storage.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
delayed bloome0
Direction
most effectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon delayed bloom most effectively when applied before 5°C cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon caused flower bud abscission in peach when applied after the chilling requirement had been satisfied.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
flower bud abscissione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon caused flower bud abscission when treatments were made after the chilling requirement had been satisfied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–98 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · crop injury · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.