Paper · 2020 · Pathogens

Sustainable and Ecofriendly Approach of Managing Soil Born Bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Using Dried Powder of Conyza canadensis

Ke Chen; Raja Asad Ali Khan; Wen Cao; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a devastating plant disease that inflicts heavy losses to the large number of economic host plants it infects. The potential of dried powder of the Conyza canadensis to control bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato was explored in vitro and in planta. Three application times (16 days before transplanting (DBT), 8 DBT and 0 DBT), three plastic-mulch durations (10 days plastic mulching (DPM), 5DPM and 0DPM) and four doses viz. 0 g, 8 g, 16 g and 24 g of the plant powder were evaluated. SEM analysis was also conducted to observe the change in bacterial cell morphology. Ethanol extract of dried C. canadensis in different concentrations inhibited the in vitro growth of R. solanacearum by as much as 98% of that produced by ampicillin. As evident from the scanning electron micrograph, the highest concentration produced severe morphologic changes, such as rupture of the bacterial cell walls and cell contents leaked out. Results from application time and dose experiment demonstrated that the highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm), plant height (74.3 ± 4.7 cm), fresh biomass (58.3 ± 4.3 g), reduction in bacterial population (1.52 log10) and resulted in lowest AUDPC value (1156.6). In case of mulching duration and dose experiment the maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM. The better results of highest dose and longer application time can be explained on the basis of higher amounts of anti-microbial plant bio-active compounds in highest dose and the longer exposure time of the pathogen to these chemicals. The better results of longer mulching duration are due to faster and more complete decomposition (because of 10-days-long plastic-mulch-provided increased solar heat) of the dried powder which produced more amounts of volatile and non-volatile bactericidal compounds. Our results clearly suggest that the use of 24 g kg−1 dried plant powder of C. canadensis plastic-mulched for two weeks could be used as a reliable component of the integrated disease management program against BW.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conyza extract inhibited Ralstonia growth in vitro up to 98% of ampicillin activity.

Treatment
Ethanol extract of dried C. canadensise0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
growth of R. solanacearume0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
ampicilline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethanol extract of dried C. canadensis in different concentrations inhibited the in vitro growth of R. solanacearum by as much as 98% of that produced by ampicillin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest extract concentration ruptured Ralstonia cell walls and caused leakage.

Treatment
highest concentratione0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
rupture of the bacterial cell walls and cell contents leaked oute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest concentration produced severe morphologic changes, such as rupture of the bacterial cell walls and cell contents leaked out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–739 · show in text ↑
e2

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powder at 24 g kg−1 applied 16 days before transplanting gave maximum tomato root length of 34.0 ± 2.5 cm.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBTe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
34.0 ± 2.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same powder treatment gave maximum plant height of 74.3 ± 4.7 cm.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBTe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
74.3 ± 4.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm), plant height (74.3 ± 4.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same powder treatment gave maximum fresh biomass of 58.3 ± 4.3 g.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBTe0
Outcome
fresh biomasse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
58.3 ± 4.3 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm), plant height (74.3 ± 4.7 cm), fresh biomass (58.3 ± 4.3 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same powder treatment reduced bacterial population by 1.52 log10.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBTe0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
bacterial populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
1.52 log10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm), plant height (74.3 ± 4.7 cm), fresh biomass (58.3 ± 4.3 g), reduction in bacterial population (1.52 log10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1264 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the lowest AUDPC value of 1156.6.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBTe0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1156.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 g kg−1 mixed with infested soil 16 DBT gave maximum root length (34.0 ± 2.5 cm), plant height (74.3 ± 4.7 cm), fresh biomass (58.3 ± 4.3 g), reduction in bacterial population (1.52 log10) and resulted in lowest AUDPC value (1156.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 24 g kg−1 powder dose with 10 days mulching gave maximum root length of 39.6 ± 3.2 cm.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPMe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
39.6 ± 3.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched powder treatment gave maximum plant height of 78.3 ± 5.8 cm.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
78.3 ± 5.8 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched powder treatment gave maximum fresh biomass of 65.6 ± 4.9 g.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPMe0
Outcome
fresh biomasse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.6 ± 4.9 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched powder treatment reduced bacterial population by 1.59 log10.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPMe0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
bacterial populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
1.59 log10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched powder treatment gave the lowest AUDPC value of 1251.6.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPMe0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1251.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root length (39.6 ± 3.2 cm), plant height (78.3 ± 5.8 cm), fresh biomass (65.6 ± 4.9 g) reduction in bacterial population (1.59 log10) and lowest AUDPC value (1251.6) was achieved through the application of highest powder dose viz. 24 g kg−1 and longest plastic mulching duration of 10 DPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend 24 g kg−1 dried Conyza powder under plastic mulch as an integrated wilt management component.

Treatment
24 g kg−1 dried plant powder of C. canadensis plastic-mulched for two weekse0
Outcome
reliable component of the integrated disease management program against BWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of 24 g kg−1 dried plant powder of C. canadensis plastic-mulched for two weeks could be used as a reliable component of the integrated disease management program against BW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2200–2380 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (BW) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–265 · show in text ↑

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

transplanting · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

transplanting · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mulching · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

transplanting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

infection · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 29 positive, 27 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

infection · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 26 positive, 33 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

infection · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.