Abstract
Investigations were conducted in four different villages in Gopalganj district of Bihar to assess the performance of newer insecticides against whitefly in tomato. The experiment consisted of seven treatments laid out in randomized block design replicated three times with plant spacing of 60 x 50 cm. All the alternate sprays of newer insecticides were found significantly superior over the farmers’ practice and untreated check in minimizing the whiteflies infestation on the crop. Among the various treatments alternate spray of spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days interval resulted in minimum number of whiteflies per plant (4.52) as compared to dimethoate 30 EC (farmers'practice)and controlwith12.68 and 29.45 whitefliesper plantrespectively. The number of curled leaves per plant was also minimum in spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days interval (24.16%). The yield was recorded maximum in the same treatment (144.96 q/ha). Thus there was an increase of 53.68 q/ha of tomato crop in this treatmentover control with maximum net return of Rs 58, 161.00. The B-C ratio of 10.65: 1 was highest in treatment alternate spray of chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.25 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 1.0 g/l water at 15 days interval.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate newer insecticide sprays significantly minimized whitefly infestation versus farmer practice and untreated check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- alternate sprays of newer insecticidese0
- Interactor
- whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
- Outcome
- whiteflies infestatione0
- Direction
- minimizinge0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practice and untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the alternate sprays of newer insecticides were found significantly superior over the farmers’ practice and untreated check in minimizing the whiteflies infestation on the crop.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Spiromecifen and thiomethoxam sprays gave a minimum of 4.52 whiteflies per plant.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- alternate spray of spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days intervale0
- Interactor
- whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
- Outcome
- number of whiteflies per plante0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 4.52e0
- Qualifier
- controlwith12.68 and 29.45 whitefliesper plantrespectivelye0
- Comparator
- dimethoate 30 ECe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“alternate spray of spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days interval resulted in minimum number of whiteflies per plant (4.52) as compared to dimethoate 30 EC (farmers'practice)and controlwith12.68 and 29.45 whitefliesper plantrespectively.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The same spray gave the minimum curled leaves per plant at 24.16%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days intervale0
- Outcome
- number of curled leaves per plante0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 24.16%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of curled leaves per plant was also minimum in spiromecifen 240 SC @ 1.0 ml/l and thiomethoxam 25 WSG @ 0.25 ml/l at 15 days interval (24.16%).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave maximum tomato yield of 144.96 q/ha.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- the same treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 144.96 q/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield was recorded maximum in the same treatment (144.96 q/ha).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato yield under that treatment increased 53.68 q/ha over control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- tomato crope0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 53.68 q/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was an increase of 53.68 q/ha of tomato crop in this treatmentover control”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave maximum net return of Rs 58, 161.00.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs 58, 161.00e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in this treatmentover control with maximum net return of Rs 58, 161.00.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorfenapyr and acetamiprid alternate sprays gave the highest B-C ratio, 10.65: 1.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- alternate spray of chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.25 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 1.0 g/l water at 15 days intervale0
- Outcome
- B-C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.65: 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The B-C ratio of 10.65: 1 was highest in treatment alternate spray of chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.25 ml/l and acetamiprid 20 SP @ 1.0 g/l water at 15 days interval.”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Aleyrodoidea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · Aleyrodoidea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.