Paper · 2018 · Journal of Applied Horticulture

Effect of endophytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis EPC 5 on basal stem rot disease spread and nut yield in coconut plantations

L. Rajendran; G. Karthikeyan; T. Raguchander; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The wood degrading fungi Ganoderma lucidum (Leys) Karst causing Basal Stem Rot (BSR) in coconut plantation is the most destructive disease in Southern India. The control of this soil borne pathogen is particularly complex due to their occurrence in dynamic environment at the interface of the root with the soil. Hence, combinations of biocontrol agents differing in their mode of action especially with endophyte have been explored. The endophytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis EPC 5 from healthy coconut palm root showed high inhibition activity among fifty five isolated strains. Further, talc-based formulation incorporating Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Trichoderma viride Tv1 were developed and used individually, in combination to manage highly virulent, laccase producing soil borne pathogen. The result indicated that soil application of above mentioned antagonist in combination @ 100 g each enriched with organic substrate for four times per year, significantly reduced the disease severity with high nut yield at two different locations of disease endemic areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis EPC 5 showed high inhibition among 55 isolated strains.

Taxon
coconut palmCocos nuciferae1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis EPC 5Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cocos nucifera
Cocos nucifera · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The endophytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis EPC 5 from healthy coconut palm root showed high inhibition activity among fifty five isolated strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“coconut palm root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined antagonist application significantly reduced basal stem rot disease severity.

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
soil application of above mentioned antagonist in combination @ 100 g each enriched with organic substrate for four times per yeare0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
two different locations of disease endemic arease0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of above mentioned antagonist in combination @ 100 g each enriched with organic substrate for four times per year, significantly reduced the disease severity with high nut yield at two different locations of disease endemic areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“coconut plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined antagonist application produced high nut yield at two endemic locations.

Taxon
coconutt0
Treatment
soil application of above mentioned antagonist in combination @ 100 g each enriched with organic substrate for four times per yeare0
Outcome
nut yielde0
Direction
highe0
Setting
two different locations of disease endemic arease0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of above mentioned antagonist in combination @ 100 g each enriched with organic substrate for four times per year, significantly reduced the disease severity with high nut yield at two different locations of disease endemic areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“coconut plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–123 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · yield · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · disease · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Aureofungin-sol root feeding with Bordeaux drenching and neem cake achieved the lowest disease index.

    Management of basal stem rot of coconut · 2001 · compared with tridemorph root feeding (2%) + soil drenching (0.1%) at quarterly interval along with soil application of neem cake at 5 kg/palm/year

    Same direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.