Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University

Physico-microbial and shelf life analysis of commercially important three mango varieties under different treatments

Mst Tasmim; Most Nahar; Md Hossain; et al.

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Every year huge quantity of mangoes is lost due to lack of proper postharvest storage condition. Various treatments are used to minimize postharvest losses and extend shelf life. So, an experiment was carried out at the Laboratories of the Department of Horticulture and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from July to October, 2018 to investigate the effect of variety and different postharvest treatments to extend shelf life of mango. The two-factor experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block design with three replications. The factors taken for the experiments were (i) three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina and (ii) six postharvest treatments, viz., T1 = control; T2 = perforated low density polythene (LDPE) bag with KMnO4; T3 = perforated LDPE bag without KMnO4; T4 = mustard oil coating; T5 = hot water treatment (50º C) for 5 minutes; T6 = garlic extracts. Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments. Untreated mango was considered as control. The treated fruits showed significant differences in case of peel color, firmness, total weight loss, disease incidence and severity, and shelf life compared to control fruits. Among the treatments, T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 showed the longest shelf life (12 days), less disease incidence and severity and the lowest weight loss at 9 DAS days after storage. The treatment T5 (hot water treatment @ 50º C for 5 minutes) was also found effective for maintaining postharvest quality of mango stored at ambient conditions. [J Bangladesh Agril Univ 2020; 18(1.000): 40-46]

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 (perforated LDPE bag with KMnO4) gave the longest mango shelf life, 12 days, among the treatments.

Material
V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwinae3
Treatment
perforated LDPE with KMnO4e1
Outcome
shelf lifee1
Direction
longeste1
Value
12 dayse1
Comparator
Among the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among the treatments, T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 showed the longest shelf life (12 days), less disease incidence and severity and the lowest weight loss at 9 DAS days after storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1461 · show in text ↑
e2

“Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑
e3

“three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 gave less mango disease incidence and severity than the other treatments.

Material
V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwinae3
Treatment
perforated LDPE with KMnO4e1
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
Among the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among the treatments, T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 showed the longest shelf life (12 days), less disease incidence and severity and the lowest weight loss at 9 DAS days after storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1461 · show in text ↑
e2

“Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑
e3

“three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 gave the lowest mango weight loss at 9 days after storage.

Material
V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwinae3
Treatment
perforated LDPE with KMnO4e1
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
loweste1
Qualifier
at 9 DAS days after storagee1
Comparator
Among the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among the treatments, T2 perforated LDPE with KMnO4 showed the longest shelf life (12 days), less disease incidence and severity and the lowest weight loss at 9 DAS days after storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1461 · show in text ↑
e2

“Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑
e3

“three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment at 50º C for 5 minutes was also effective for maintaining postharvest quality of mango stored at ambient conditions.

Material
V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwinae3
Treatment
hot water treatment @ 50º C for 5 minutese4
Outcome
postharvest qualitye4
Comparator
controle5
Setting
ambient conditionse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑
e3

“three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–734 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatment T5 (hot water treatment @ 50º C for 5 minutes) was also found effective for maintaining postharvest quality of mango stored at ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1622 · show in text ↑
e5

“Untreated mango was considered as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel colour, firmness, total weight loss, disease incidence and severity, and shelf life differed significantly between the treatments and control mango fruits.

Material
V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwinae3
Treatment
different treatmentse2
Outcome
peel color, firmness, total weight loss, disease incidence and severity, and shelf lifee6
Comparator
control fruitse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Freshly harvested mango was treated with those different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑
e3

“three varieties of mango, viz., V1= Langra, V2= Fazli and V3= Ashwina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–734 · show in text ↑
e6

“The treated fruits showed significant differences in case of peel color, firmness, total weight loss, disease incidence and severity, and shelf life compared to control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1276 · show in text ↑

potassium permanganate · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

poly(ethylene) · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

poly(ethylene) · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.