Paper · 2006 · Journal of Applied Horticulture

Effects of organic manure on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) production

J. OfosuAnim; E.T. Blay; M.E. Frempong

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon. Results obtained revealed that the application of recycled garden solid waste compost, poultry manure and cow dung improved the soil physical condition, particularly, structure and drainage, increased nutrient and organic matter levels and enhanced the yield components of okra plants. Inorganic fertilizer improved only chemical properties, but soil physical properties such as structure was not improved. There were improvements in pod yield, yield components and pod fibre content on all manured plots. The study clearly inidicated the superiority of poultry manure over cow dung and compost as a source of manure for okra production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures improved the physical condition of the soil, particularly structure and drainage.

Treatment
application of recycled garden solid waste compost, poultry manure and cow dunge1
Outcome
soil physical conditione1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
particularly, structure and drainagee1
Setting
University of Ghana, Legone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of recycled garden solid waste compost, poultry manure and cow dung improved the soil physical condition, particularly, structure and drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures increased nutrient and organic matter levels in the soil.

Treatment
application of recycled garden solid waste compost, poultry manure and cow dunge1
Outcome
nutrient and organic matter levelse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of recycled garden solid waste compost, poultry manure and cow dung improved the soil physical condition, particularly, structure and drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased nutrient and organic matter levels and enhanced the yield components of okra plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manured plots had improvements in pod yield, yield components and pod fibre content.

Treatment
manured plotse4
Outcome
pod yield, yield components and pod fibre contente4
Direction
improvementse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e4

“There were improvements in pod yield, yield components and pod fibre content on all manured plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer improved only chemical properties of the soil.

Treatment
Inorganic fertilizere3
Outcome
chemical propertiese3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inorganic fertilizer improved only chemical properties, but soil physical properties such as structure was not improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer did not improve soil physical properties such as structure.

Treatment
Inorganic fertilizere3
Outcome
soil physical properties such as structuree3
Direction
not improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e3

“Inorganic fertilizer improved only chemical properties, but soil physical properties such as structure was not improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure was superior to cow dung and compost as a manure source for okra production.

Treatment
poultry manuree5
Outcome
okra productione5
Direction
superioritye5
Comparator
cow dung and composte5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different organic manures (cow dung, poultry manure and compost) on the yield of okra, soil physical and chemical characteristics was investigated at the University of Ghana, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
e5

“The study clearly inidicated the superiority of poultry manure over cow dung and compost as a source of manure for okra production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–832 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.