Paper · 2019 · Scientific Journal of Applied Sciences of Sabratha University

THE EFFECT OF SALINITY ON LIBYAN SOFT WHEAT TRITICUM AESTIVUM L AT GERMINATION STAGE

Amal Faraj Ehtaiwesh; Fatma Hossen Rashed

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Salinity is the major abiotic stress that reduces plant growth and productivity worldwide. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effects of salinity on seedling characters of soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes and to define if responses varied among wheat genotypes. For that, 12 genotypes of wheat were evaluated for the salinity tolerance in artificially induced with NaCl at their germination and early seedling stage. Seeds were subjected to four levels of salinity (0, 50, 100 and 150 mM NaCl) and raised for eight days under optimum conditions to calculate the final germination percentage, speed of germination, mean daily germination, shoot and root length, and seedling fresh and dry weight. The response of genotypes were divers among the studied traits. At higher concentration of NaCl (100 and 150mM), speed of germination and mean daily germination were delayed and final germination percentage was decreased. At higher salinity level, significant decrease in shoots and roots length, seedling dry weight and seedling vigor. Additionally, the study showed considerable variation in salinity tolerance among wheat genotypes for studied traits. The study concluded that there is a genetic variability among genotypes and that genotypes varied in their response to salinity stress and that genotypes Sabha, Salambo, Makkawi and Bushi were the most tolerant genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotypes differed in responses across studied traits.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
response of genotypes were divers among the studied traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of genotypes were divers among the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 and 150mM NaCl, speed of germination and mean daily germination were delayed.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
NaCl (100 and 150mM)e0
Outcome
speed of germination and mean daily germinatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher concentration of NaCl (100 and 150mM), speed of germination and mean daily germination were delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 and 150mM NaCl, final germination percentage decreased.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
NaCl (100 and 150mM)e0
Outcome
final germination percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher concentration of NaCl (100 and 150mM), speed of germination and mean daily germination were delayed and final germination percentage was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher salinity significantly decreased shoot and root length.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
higher salinity levele0
Outcome
shoots and roots lengthe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher salinity level, significant decrease in shoots and roots length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1014 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher salinity significantly decreased seedling dry weight and vigor.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
higher salinity levele0
Outcome
seedling dry weight and seedling vigore0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher salinity level, significant decrease in shoots and roots length, seedling dry weight and seedling vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity tolerance varied considerably among wheat genotypes.

Outcome
variation in salinity tolerance among wheat genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considerable variation in salinity tolerance among wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sabha, Salambo, Makkawi and Bushi were the most tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
soft wheat Triticum aestivum LTriticum aestivume1
Material
Sabha, Salambo, Makkawi and Bushie0
Outcome
tolerant genotypese0
Direction
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes Sabha, Salambo, Makkawi and Bushi were the most tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1394 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

137 papers: 24 positive, 113 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.