Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences Belgrade

Effect of phosphorus (P) rates and weeding frequency on the growth and grain yield of extra early cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in the forest-savanna agro-ecological zone of southwest Nigeria

Olusegun Adeyemi; Kikelomo Ogunsola; Patience Olorunmaiye; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (7o 20?N, 30 23?E) during the 2014 early and late cropping seasons to evaluate the effect of weeding frequency and phosphorus fertilizer application on the growth and grain yield of the early maturing cowpea variety (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot arrangement fitted into a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The main plot consisted of three phosphorus fertilizer rates (0, 15 and 30 P2O5kg ha-1) while the subplot comprised five weeding frequencies (no weeding, weed-free, hoe weeding at 3 weeks after sowing (WAS), hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS and weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WAS). The results showed that plots treated with phosphorus fertilizer at 15 kg ha-1 produced the highest number of leaves and the tallest plant in the late season while the highest grain yield was recorded in the early trials. Weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WAS during the early season trial gave the highest grain yield compared with other weeding treatments. Unchecked weed infestation reduced yield by 53.10 % and 49.9 % in the early and late seasons respectively compared to the maximum obtained from weed-free plots. This study concluded that application of 15 kg P2O5 ha-1 and weed removal at 3, 6 and 9 WAS were effective for effective weed control and optimum grain yield in cowpea production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 15 kg ha-1 gave the highest number of leaves and the tallest plants in the late season.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilizer at 15 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
number of leaves and the tallest plante1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
late seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that plots treated with phosphorus fertilizer at 15 kg ha-1 produced the highest number of leaves and the tallest plant in the late season while the highest grain yield was recorded in the early trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–978 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest cowpea grain yield was recorded in the early trials.

Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
early trialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that plots treated with phosphorus fertilizer at 15 kg ha-1 produced the highest number of leaves and the tallest plant in the late season while the highest grain yield was recorded in the early trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WAS gave the highest cowpea grain yield compared with other weeding treatments in the early season.

Treatment
Weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WASe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
other weeding treatmentse2
Setting
early season triale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WAS during the early season trial gave the highest grain yield compared with other weeding treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unchecked weed infestation reduced cowpea yield by 53.10% in the early season relative to weed-free plots.

Treatment
Unchecked weed infestatione3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
53.10 %e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
earlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“Unchecked weed infestation reduced yield by 53.10 % and 49.9 % in the early and late seasons respectively compared to the maximum obtained from weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unchecked weed infestation reduced cowpea yield by 49.9% in the late season relative to weed-free plots.

Treatment
Unchecked weed infestatione3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
49.9 %e3
Comparator
weed-free plotse3
Setting
latee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“Unchecked weed infestation reduced yield by 53.10 % and 49.9 % in the early and late seasons respectively compared to the maximum obtained from weed-free plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1264 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 15 kg P2O5 ha-1 with weed removal at 3, 6 and 9 WAS is recommended for optimum cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
application of 15 kg P2O5 ha-1e4
Outcome
optimum grain yielde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“extra early cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of 15 kg P2O5 ha-1 and weed removal at 3, 6 and 9 WAS were effective for effective weed control and optimum grain yield in cowpea production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1444 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.