Paper · 2006 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Cowpea viruses: Quantitative and qualitative effects of single and mixed viral infections

M. A. Taiwo; Olajide Joseph Akinjogunla

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Multiple viral infections have been reported on cultivated commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in Nigeria. In this study, the effect of inoculating two commercial cultivars (cvs) (“Oloyin” and “Olo II’) and two lines from IITA (Ife Brown and TVu-76) with buffer, Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic (CABMV), Cowpea mottle (CMeV) and Southern bean mosaic (SBMV) viruses individually as well as in mixtures (CABMV+ CMeV, CABMV+ SBMV, CMeV+SBMV, and CABMV+ CMeV+SBMV) at 10 and 28 days after planting (DAP) on the growth, yield and nutritive content of seeds from infected plants were evaluated. The age of the plants at time of infection and the different viral treatments significantly affected the different parameters assessed. The average height of plants inoculated 10 DAP were significantly shorter than those of plants inoculated 28 DAP. Inoculating with single, double and triple viruses (10 DAP) resulted in 19-34%, 31-46% and 42-53% reductions in plant height, respectively. Viral infections also resulted in significant reductions in the number of pods and seeds produced. Plants inoculated with the three viruses 10 DAP produced the least number of pods and seed. Viral treatments resulted in the production of seeds with a lower protein content of 24.8-28.9% compared with the 28.5-30.4% protein in seeds from the control plants. Plants inoculated 10 DAP with the triple viruses produced the seeds with the least protein content (24.8-27.1%). The carbohydrate, fat and moisture contents of seeds from virus infected plants were however slightly higher than those of the control plants while the ash contents were lower. Generally, the commercial cowpea cvs were more severely affected by the viral treatments. These results indicate that infection at an early age and by multiple viruses can have devastating effects on the growth, yield and the nutritional quality of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation at 10 DAP caused shorter plants than inoculation at 28 DAP.

Treatment
inoculated 10 DAPe0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
inoculated 28 DAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average height of plants inoculated 10 DAP were significantly shorter than those of plants inoculated 28 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single virus inoculation at 10 DAP reduced plant height 19-34%.

Treatment
singlee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
19-34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating with single, double and triple viruses (10 DAP) resulted in 19-34%, 31-46% and 42-53% reductions in plant height, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double virus inoculation at 10 DAP reduced plant height 31-46%.

Treatment
doublee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
31-46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating with single, double and triple viruses (10 DAP) resulted in 19-34%, 31-46% and 42-53% reductions in plant height, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple virus inoculation at 10 DAP reduced plant height 42-53%.

Treatment
triplee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
42-53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating with single, double and triple viruses (10 DAP) resulted in 19-34%, 31-46% and 42-53% reductions in plant height, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Viral infection reduced pod and seed numbers.

Treatment
Viral infectionse0
Outcome
number of pods and seeds producede0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Viral infections also resulted in significant reductions in the number of pods and seeds produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple virus inoculation at 10 DAP produced the fewest pods and seeds.

Treatment
three viruses 10 DAPe0
Outcome
number of pods and seede0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with the three viruses 10 DAP produced the least number of pods and seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus treated plants had lower seed protein, 24.8-28.9%, than control plants at 28.5-30.4%.

Treatment
Viral treatmentse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
24.8-28.9%e0
Qualifier
28.5-30.4%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Viral treatments resulted in the production of seeds with a lower protein content of 24.8-28.9% compared with the 28.5-30.4% protein in seeds from the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple virus inoculation at 10 DAP gave the least seed protein, 24.8-27.1%.

Treatment
triple virusese0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
leaste0
Value
24.8-27.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated 10 DAP with the triple viruses produced the seeds with the least protein content (24.8-27.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infected seeds had slightly higher carbohydrate, fat, and moisture content.

Treatment
virus infectede0
Outcome
carbohydrate, fat and moisture contentse0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbohydrate, fat and moisture contents of seeds from virus infected plants were however slightly higher than those of the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infected seeds had lower ash content.

Outcome
ash contentse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the ash contents were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“commercial cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial cowpea cultivars were more severely affected by viral treatments.

Material
commercial cowpea cvse0
Treatment
viral treatmentse0
Outcome
severely affectede0
Direction
more severelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“commercial cowpea cvs were more severely affected by the viral treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1712 · show in text ↑

infection · quality: sugar starch · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.