Paper · 2020 · BMC Plant Biology

Impact of sugar beet seed priming using the SMP method on the properties of the pericarp

C. Chomontowski; S. Podlaski

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study determined the effects of two solid matrix priming methods on changes in the characteristics of two lots of the same variety of sugar beet fruits that differ in the level of vigour. RESULTS: Seed treatment within each level of vigour did not significantly affect helium and apparent density, total pore volume and total porosity. However, there was a tendency to increase porosity due to priming. This is probably why seed priming significantly increased mesopore diameter in both high and low vigour seeds. These changes increased the water content in the pericarp and the seeds and increased the water potential during germination. The high level of electrical conductivity of the fruit extracts was associated with low seed vigour. Low vigour resulted in higher humidity of the pericarp and decreased seed moisture and was also associated with lower water potential of the pericarp and seeds. CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference in the water content in the pericarp and seeds was indicative of imbibition and problems with water flow between these centres, which resulted in a low water diffusion coefficient of the pericarp. This low water diffusion coefficient was correlated with the prolongation of the seed germination time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment within each level of vigour did not significantly affect helium and apparent density, total pore volume and total porosity.

Treatment
Seed treatmente0
Outcome
helium and apparent density, total pore volume and total porositye0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment within each level of vigour did not significantly affect helium and apparent density, total pore volume and total porosity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

there was a tendency to increase porosity due to priming.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
porositye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a tendency to increase porosity due to priming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

seed priming significantly increased mesopore diameter in both high and low vigour seeds.

Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
mesopore diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming significantly increased mesopore diameter in both high and low vigour seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These changes increased the water content in the pericarp and the seeds and increased the water potential during germination.

Outcome
water content in the pericarp and the seedse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased the water content in the pericarp and the seeds and increased the water potential during germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These changes increased the water content in the pericarp and the seeds and increased the water potential during germination.

Outcome
water potential during germinatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These changes increased the water content in the pericarp and the seeds and increased the water potential during germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high level of electrical conductivity of the fruit extracts was associated with low seed vigour.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
seed vigoure0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high level of electrical conductivity of the fruit extracts was associated with low seed vigour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low vigour resulted in higher humidity of the pericarp and decreased seed moisture

Organ / stage
pericarpe0
Outcome
humidity of the pericarpe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low vigour resulted in higher humidity of the pericarp and decreased seed moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low vigour resulted in higher humidity of the pericarp and decreased seed moisture

Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
seed moisturee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low vigour resulted in higher humidity of the pericarp and decreased seed moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

was also associated with lower water potential of the pericarp and seeds.

Organ / stage
pericarp and seedse0
Outcome
water potential of the pericarp and seedse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was also associated with lower water potential of the pericarp and seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a low water diffusion coefficient of the pericarp.

Outcome
water diffusion coefficient of the pericarpe0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a low water diffusion coefficient of the pericarp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This low water diffusion coefficient was correlated with the prolongation of the seed germination time.

Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
seed germination timee0
Direction
prolongatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This low water diffusion coefficient was correlated with the prolongation of the seed germination time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.