Paper · 2017 · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express

Quantification of differences in germination behaviour of pelleted and coated sugar beet seeds using x-ray computed tomography (x-ray CT)

Sebastian Blunk; Ali Hafeez Malik; Martine I de Heer; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seed enhancement technologies i.e. priming, pelleting and coating have been extensively9 used throughout the last century to improve crop yield and to reduce losses associated with pest infestation. However, until recently, it has not been possible to non-destructively assess the effect of seed enhancement technologies belowground due to the opacity of soil. Using X- ray Computed Tomography (X-ray CT) we undertook a 4D visualisation of the germination process of four different sugar beet seed enhancement treatments (untreated / naked, coated, pelleted and pelleted + coated) in soil. The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of the germination process in the natural environment of the seed to inform future soil management and seed enhancement processes. Using X-ray CT we were able to quantify the germination and establishment process of different seed enhancement technologies in soil non-destructively for the first time. We observed a delay in seedling growth posed by the addition of a physical barrier, i.e. the seed coating. However, an enhanced radicle growth rate was observed in pelleted, as well as pelleted and coated seeds, after overcoming the physical barrier. The disadvantage posed by the addition of seed coating was overcome after four days of seedling growth. Further work should focus on refinements to the type and composition of the pelleting which we observed to have a retarded effect on seed germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-ray CT quantified germination and establishment in soil non-destructively.

Outcome
germination and establishment processe0
Value
first timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using X-ray CT we were able to quantify the germination and establishment process of different seed enhancement technologies in soil non-destructively for the first time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating delayed seedling growth.

Treatment
seed coatinge0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a delay in seedling growth posed by the addition of a physical barrier, i.e. the seed coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pelleted seeds showed enhanced radicle growth after overcoming the barrier.

Treatment
pelletede0
Outcome
radicle growth ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
after overcoming the physical barriere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an enhanced radicle growth rate was observed in pelleted, as well as pelleted and coated seeds, after overcoming the physical barrier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pelleted and coated seeds showed enhanced radicle growth after overcoming the barrier.

Treatment
pelleted and coatede0
Outcome
radicle growth ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
after overcoming the physical barriere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an enhanced radicle growth rate was observed in pelleted, as well as pelleted and coated seeds, after overcoming the physical barrier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disadvantage of seed coating was overcome after four days of seedling growth.

Outcome
disadvantage posed by the addition of seed coating was overcomee0
Value
four dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disadvantage posed by the addition of seed coating was overcome after four days of seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pelleting retarded seed germination.

Treatment
pelletinge0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further work should focus on refinements to the type and composition of the pelleting which we observed to have a retarded effect on seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend refining pelleting type and composition.

Outcome
refinements to the type and composition of the pelletinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further work should focus on refinements to the type and composition of the pelleting which we observed to have a retarded effect on seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.