Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Efficacy of Vermicompost and Inorganic Source of Potassium on Yield Attributing Characters, Bulb Yield of Kharif Onion and Residual Fertility Status of Soil

Priyanka Kumari; Arun Kumar Jha; Gopal Kumar; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Among all essential plant nutrients, potassium is the 3rd most likely, after nitrogen and phosphorus to limit plant productivity. The production and productivity of onion is very sensitive to potassium status in soil. Thus, it has become essential to replenish the reserve of potassium which are removed or lost from the soil. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of potassium or alone influence on productivity and storability of kharif onion. A field experiment was conducted in split plot design with 15 treatments and 3 replications at Bihar Agricultural College Farm of BAU, Sabour, (Bhagalpur) during the year 2018-19. Three planting methods of kharifonion (T1: Flat bed, T2: Raised bed and T3: Ridge bed) and five nutritional modules (C1: Control, C2: 100% KFert.,C3: 100% KVC, C4 :50% KFert. + 50% KVC and C5: 75% KFert. + 25% KVC) where allocated in main and sub-plots respectively. Results from field experiment indicated that planting methods did not influenced growth parameter, yield attributing characters and quality parameter of onion bulb, significantly. The maximum number of leaves at 70 DAT (5.99), 90 DAT (8.14) and 120 DAT (9.95) were recorded in plot receiving 50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizer. The neck thickness was not influenced by nutritional modules. The maximum polar diameter of bulb (4.22 cm) was found with C4 (50% KFert. + 50% KVC) treatment. The highest TSS content of bulb (12.42 oBrix) was recorded with treatment C3 (100% potassium through vermicompost). However, yield of kharif onion was augmented significantly by planting methods and the highest bulb yield (31.84 t ha-1) was recorded in Raised bed method. The physiological weight losses were found the highest (34.81%) in C2 and lowest (26.82%) in C3 after 90 days of storage, as compared to the initial weight of bulbs. Rotting percentage of bulb was also recorded to be the lowest in C3 treated onion bulb. After harvest, soil reaction (pH), Electrical conductivity (EC) and Cation exchange capacity (CEC) were not affected by planting methods and nutritional modules. The maximum value of SOC,available nitrogen and available phosphorus was obtained in that soil in which 100% of recommended K was supplied through vermicompost (VC).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting methods did not significantly influence growth, yield-attributing and bulb quality parameters of onion.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
planting methodse1
Outcome
growth parameter, yield attributing characters and quality parameter of onion bulbe1
Direction
did not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting methods did not influenced growth parameter, yield attributing characters and quality parameter of onion bulb, significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves at 70 DAT was highest with 50% K through vermicompost plus 50% K through chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizere2
Outcome
number of leaves at 70 DATe2
Direction
maximume2
Value
5.99e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum number of leaves at 70 DAT (5.99), 90 DAT (8.14) and 120 DAT (9.95) were recorded in plot receiving 50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves at 90 DAT was highest with 50% K through vermicompost plus 50% K through chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizere2
Outcome
number of leavese2
Direction
maximume2
Value
8.14e2
Qualifier
90 DAT (8.14)e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum number of leaves at 70 DAT (5.99), 90 DAT (8.14) and 120 DAT (9.95) were recorded in plot receiving 50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves at 120 DAT was highest with 50% K through vermicompost plus 50% K through chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizere2
Outcome
number of leavese2
Direction
maximume2
Value
9.95e2
Qualifier
120 DAT (9.95)e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum number of leaves at 70 DAT (5.99), 90 DAT (8.14) and 120 DAT (9.95) were recorded in plot receiving 50% recommended K through vermicompost and 50% recommended K through chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neck thickness of onion was not influenced by nutritional modules.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
nutritional modulese3
Outcome
neck thicknesse3
Direction
not influencede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e3

“The neck thickness was not influenced by nutritional modules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polar diameter of bulb was greatest with C4 (50% KFert. + 50% KVC) treatment.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
C4 (50% KFert. + 50% KVC)e4
Outcome
polar diameter of bulbe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
4.22 cme4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum polar diameter of bulb (4.22 cm) was found with C4 (50% KFert. + 50% KVC) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS content of bulb was highest with C3 (100% potassium through vermicompost).

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
C3 (100% potassium through vermicompost)e5
Outcome
TSS content of bulbe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
12.42 oBrixe5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest TSS content of bulb (12.42 oBrix) was recorded with treatment C3 (100% potassium through vermicompost)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of kharif onion was augmented significantly by planting methods.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
planting methodse6
Outcome
yield of kharif onione6
Direction
augmentede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, yield of kharif onion was augmented significantly by planting methods and the highest bulb yield (31.84 t ha-1) was recorded in Raised bed method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb yield was highest in the raised bed planting method.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
Raised bed methode6
Outcome
bulb yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
31.84 t ha-1e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, yield of kharif onion was augmented significantly by planting methods and the highest bulb yield (31.84 t ha-1) was recorded in Raised bed method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological weight loss after 90 days of storage was highest in C2 relative to the initial bulb weight.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
C2e7
Outcome
physiological weight lossese7
Direction
the higheste7
Value
34.81%e7
Qualifier
after 90 days of storagee7
Comparator
the initial weight of bulbse7

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e7

“The physiological weight losses were found the highest (34.81%) in C2 and lowest (26.82%) in C3 after 90 days of storage, as compared to the initial weight of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological weight loss after 90 days of storage was lowest in C3 relative to the initial bulb weight.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
C3e7
Outcome
physiological weight lossese7
Direction
loweste7
Value
26.82%e7
Qualifier
after 90 days of storagee7
Comparator
the initial weight of bulbse7

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e7

“The physiological weight losses were found the highest (34.81%) in C2 and lowest (26.82%) in C3 after 90 days of storage, as compared to the initial weight of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotting percentage of bulb was lowest in C3.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
C3e2
Outcome
Rotting percentage of bulbe2
Direction
the loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rotting percentage of bulb was also recorded to be the lowest in C3 treated onion bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil reaction, electrical conductivity and cation exchange capacity were not affected by planting methods or nutritional modules.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
planting methods and nutritional modulese3
Outcome
soil reaction (pH), Electrical conductivity (EC) and Cation exchange capacity (CEC)e3
Direction
not affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e3

“After harvest, soil reaction (pH), Electrical conductivity (EC) and Cation exchange capacity (CEC) were not affected by planting methods and nutritional modules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOC, available nitrogen and available phosphorus were highest in soil receiving 100% of recommended K through vermicompost.

Taxon
Kharif Oniont0
Treatment
100% of recommended K was supplied through vermicompost (VC)e4
Outcome
SOC,available nitrogen and available phosphoruse4
Direction
maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Kharif Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum value of SOC,available nitrogen and available phosphorus was obtained in that soil in which 100% of recommended K was supplied through vermicompost (VC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2288 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.