Paper · 1980 · HortScience

Effects of No-tillage and Herbicides on Carrot and Onion Seed Production1

W. F. Campbell; J. L. Anderson

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.) were planted in Kidman silt loam immediately after DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), ethofumesate (2-ethoxy-2,3-dmydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranol methanesulfonate), linuron (3-(3,4-dichlo-rophyenyl)-l-methoxy-l-methylurea), napropamide (2-( a -naphthoxy) N , N -diethylpropiona-mide), or trifluralin ( a , a , a -trifluoro-2,6 dinitro- N , N -dipropyl- p -toluidine) had been soil incorporated. In a second experiment, carrot roots and onion bulbs were planted in a conventionally-prepared seed bed or among vigorously growing wheat plants (7 to 10 cm tall). DCPA, linuron, and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro- N 4 , N 4 -dipropylsulfanilamide) plus glyphosate ( N -(phos-phonomethyl)glycine) were surface applied to these seedbeds after planting but prior to crop emergence. Methazole (2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-l,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5-dione) and nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl- p -nitrophenyl ether) were applied postemergence. Chemical treatments significantly altered the seed yields within the no-tillage method. Carrots grown in the tilled plots exhibited no effect of chemical treatments on seed yield. Comparison of tillage methods indicated a highly significant reduction in carrot seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots. Those on the non-weeded control and no-tillage plots showed a highly significant reduction in seed yield. Many of the onion bulbs from male-fertile lines failed to develop seedstalks in the plots sprayed with linuron and napropamide and those that did were delayed in development. Linuron and ethofumesate reduced the numbers of onion flowers per umbel. Onions grown in the tilled plots exhibited no effect of chemical treatments on seed yield. Those on the non-weeded control and no-tillage plots showed a highly significant reduction in onion seed yield. Comparison of tillage methods indicated a highly significant reduction in onion seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments significantly altered seed yields within the no-tillage method in carrot and onion.

Taxon
Carrot rootsDaucus carotae1
Treatment
Chemical treatmentse2
Outcome
seed yieldse2
Qualifier
within the no-tillage methode2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chemical treatments significantly altered the seed yields within the no-tillage method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments had no effect on carrot seed yield in the tilled plots.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotae3
Treatment
chemical treatmentse3
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
no effecte3
Setting
tilled plotse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“Carrots grown in the tilled plots exhibited no effect of chemical treatments on seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage methods reduced carrot seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots, with high significance.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae4
Treatment
tillage methodse4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
no-tillage plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“Comparison of tillage methods indicated a highly significant reduction in carrot seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-weeded control and no-tillage plots reduced carrot seed yield, with high significance.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotae3
Treatment
non-weeded controle5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“Carrots grown in the tilled plots exhibited no effect of chemical treatments on seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1189 · show in text ↑
e5

“Those on the non-weeded control and no-tillage plots showed a highly significant reduction in seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron caused many onion bulbs from male-fertile lines to fail to develop seedstalks.

Taxon
onion bulbse6
Material
male-fertile linese6
Treatment
linurone6
Outcome
failed to develop seedstalkse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Many of the onion bulbs from male-fertile lines failed to develop seedstalks in the plots sprayed with linuron and napropamide and those that did were delayed in development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide caused many onion bulbs from male-fertile lines to fail to develop seedstalks.

Taxon
onion bulbse6
Material
male-fertile linese6
Treatment
napropamidee6
Outcome
failed to develop seedstalkse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Many of the onion bulbs from male-fertile lines failed to develop seedstalks in the plots sprayed with linuron and napropamide and those that did were delayed in development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron delayed development of the onion bulbs that did develop seedstalks.

Taxon
onion bulbse6
Material
male-fertile linese6
Treatment
linurone6
Outcome
delayed in developmente6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Many of the onion bulbs from male-fertile lines failed to develop seedstalks in the plots sprayed with linuron and napropamide and those that did were delayed in development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide delayed development of the onion bulbs that did develop seedstalks.

Taxon
onion bulbse6
Material
male-fertile linese6
Treatment
napropamidee6
Outcome
delayed in developmente6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Many of the onion bulbs from male-fertile lines failed to develop seedstalks in the plots sprayed with linuron and napropamide and those that did were delayed in development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron reduced the number of onion flowers per umbel.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
Linurone7
Outcome
numbers of onion flowers per umbele7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Linuron and ethofumesate reduced the numbers of onion flowers per umbel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethofumesate reduced the number of onion flowers per umbel.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
ethofumesatee7
Outcome
numbers of onion flowers per umbele7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Linuron and ethofumesate reduced the numbers of onion flowers per umbel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments had no effect on onion seed yield in the tilled plots.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepae2
Treatment
chemical treatmentse2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
no effecte2
Setting
tilled plotse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Onions grown in the tilled plots exhibited no effect of chemical treatments on seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-weeded control and no-tillage plots reduced onion seed yield, with high significance.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
non-weeded controle2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Those on the non-weeded control and no-tillage plots showed a highly significant reduction in onion seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage methods reduced onion seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots, with high significance.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
tillage methodse2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Comparator
no-tillage plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Carrot roots ( Daucus carota L.) and onion bulbs ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Comparison of tillage methods indicated a highly significant reduction in onion seed yield relative to the no-tillage plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1997 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.