Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Weed Management in Chilli (Capsicum Annum L.)

D. Krishnamurthy; B.K. Desai; Ma ruthi

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station Farm, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur in Hyderabad Karnataka region, to study integrated weed management in chilli (Capsicum annum L.). An experiment comprising ten treatments viz. Propaquizafop 10% EC PoE (postemergence) @ 500 ml ha-1 (50 g a.i.), Propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1 (62.5 g a.i.), Propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 750 ml ha-1 (75 g a.i.), Propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1 (125 g a.i.), Pendimethalin 30% EC PRE (preemergence) @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.), Pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) -1 IC at 30 DAT, Propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1 (62.5 g a.i.) fb (followed by) 1 intercultivation at 30 DAT, Pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) fb 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1 (62.5 g a.i.) at 2-7 leaf stage, weedy check and control (Hand weeding). All the weed control treatments resulted significant reduction in weed growth in terms of density and dry weight compared to weedy check. Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT) recorded lowest density and dry weight of weeds (12.52 m-2 and 19.99 g m-2, respectively) and higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 45 days after spraying (88.17 %). The application of pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1and propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1 has not recorded any phyto-toxicity on chilli and succeeding fodder cowpea. The maximum green chilli yield (23.2 t ha-1) was recorded three hand weedings at 35, 50 and 65 DAT and lowest green chilli yield was recorded with weedy check (13.5 t ha-1). Maximum benefit cost ratio was recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin 30% EC @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) followed by Propaquizafop 10% EC @ 625 ml ml (62.5 g a.i.) ha-1 (2.60).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments significantly reduced weed density and dry weight versus weedy check.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
density and dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments resulted significant reduction in weed growth in terms of density and dry weight compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand weedings produced the lowest weed density, 12.52 m-2.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
12.52 m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT) recorded lowest density and dry weight of weeds (12.52 m-2 and 19.99 g m-2, respectively) and higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 45 days after spraying (88.17 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand weedings produced weed dry weight of 19.99 g m-2, the lowest reported.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.99 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT) recorded lowest density and dry weight of weeds (12.52 m-2 and 19.99 g m-2, respectively) and higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 45 days after spraying (88.17 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand weedings gave higher weed control efficiency of 88.17% at 45 days after spraying.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiency (WCE)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
88.17 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding thrice at 35, 50 and 65 days after transplanting (DAT) recorded lowest density and dry weight of weeds (12.52 m-2 and 19.99 g m-2, respectively) and higher weed control efficiency (WCE) at 45 days after spraying (88.17 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named herbicide treatments caused no phytotoxicity on chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1and propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1e0
Outcome
phyto-toxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The application of pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1and propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1 has not recorded any phyto-toxicity on chilli and succeeding fodder cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named herbicide treatments caused no phytotoxicity on succeeding fodder cowpea.

Taxon
fodder cowpeae0
Treatment
pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1and propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1e0
Outcome
phyto-toxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The application of pendimethalin 30% EC PRE @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 625 ml ha-1and propaquizafop 10% EC PoE @ 1250 ml ha-1 has not recorded any phyto-toxicity on chilli and succeeding fodder cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand weedings produced maximum green chilli yield of 23.2 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
three hand weedings at 35, 50 and 65 DATe0
Outcome
green chilli yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.2 t ha-1e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum green chilli yield (23.2 t ha-1) was recorded three hand weedings at 35, 50 and 65 DAT and lowest green chilli yield was recorded with weedy check (13.5 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy check produced lowest green chilli yield of 13.5 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
weedy checke0
Outcome
green chilli yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.5 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“lowest green chilli yield was recorded with weedy check (13.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by propaquizafop produced the maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.60.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin 30% EC @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) followed by Propaquizafop 10% EC @ 625 ml ml (62.5 g a.i.) ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2.60e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum benefit cost ratio was recorded with pre emergence application of pendimethalin 30% EC @ 4160 ml ha-1 (1250 g a.i.) followed by Propaquizafop 10% EC @ 625 ml ml (62.5 g a.i.) ha-1 (2.60).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · crop injury · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

transplanting · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.