Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Organic and Inorganic Sources of Nitrogen Fertilizers on Soil Properties and Yield of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)

Lovepreet Singh; Satnam Singh; Simerpreet Kaur; et al.

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2018-2019 to study the “Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen fertilizers on soil properties and yield of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)” at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar. The experiment was laid out in randomised block design (RBD) replicated three times with ten treatments. Plant nutrients applied through inorganic fertilizer or in combinations with organic manures along with bio-fertilizer did not show any significant effect on pH and EC in different treatments but organic carbon content was influence significantly due to application of 100% FYM + bio-fertilizer compared to rest of treatments. The availability of macro and micronutrients were profound increased by integrated use of nutrient sources. Maximum values of available N, P and K were observed to be 243.10 kg ha-1, 21.24 kg ha-1 and 310.63 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizer. Similarly, available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn) were also found highest in treatment T10. During the experimentation, growth and yield attributes were also recorded. However, values regarding plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptake were noticed highest in treatment T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers) which was at par with T10 in which integrated nutrient system applied. The overall results suggests that integrated application of organic inputs along with 50% reduced chemical fertilizers was found to be best for sustaining crop productivity and enhance the soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer alone or combined with organic manures and bio-fertilizer did not significantly change soil pH or EC.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer or in combinations with organic manures along with bio-fertilizere1
Outcome
pH and ECe1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant nutrients applied through inorganic fertilizer or in combinations with organic manures along with bio-fertilizer did not show any significant effect on pH and EC in different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–597 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% FYM plus bio-fertilizer treatment significantly influenced soil organic carbon content compared with the rest of the treatments.

Treatment
100% FYM + bio-fertilizere1
Outcome
organic carbon contente1
Direction
influencee1
Comparator
rest of treatmentse1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic carbon content was influence significantly due to application of 100% FYM + bio-fertilizer compared to rest of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–731 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of nutrient sources markedly increased the availability of macro and micronutrients.

Treatment
integrated use of nutrient sourcese1
Outcome
availability of macro and micronutrientse1
Direction
profound increasede1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“The availability of macro and micronutrients were profound increased by integrated use of nutrient sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% inorganic plus 50% poultry-manure N treatment gave the maximum available N, at 243.10 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizere1
Outcome
available Ne1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
243.10 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum values of available N, P and K were observed to be 243.10 kg ha-1, 21.24 kg ha-1 and 310.63 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1098 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% inorganic plus 50% poultry-manure N treatment gave the maximum available P, at 21.24 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizere1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
21.24 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum values of available N, P and K were observed to be 243.10 kg ha-1, 21.24 kg ha-1 and 310.63 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1098 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% inorganic plus 50% poultry-manure N treatment gave the maximum available K, at 310.63 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizere1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
310.63 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum values of available N, P and K were observed to be 243.10 kg ha-1, 21.24 kg ha-1 and 310.63 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% nitrogen was supplied through inorganic fertilizer + 50% N through poultry manure conjoint with bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1098 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T10 gave the highest available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn).

Treatment
treatment T10e1
Outcome
available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn)e1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn) were also found highest in treatment T10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1196 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T2 (100% NPK inorganic fertilizers) gave the highest plant growth parameters, yield and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
100% NPK through inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptake were noticed highest in treatment T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers) which was at par with T10 in which integrated nutrient system applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1505 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T2 (100% NPK inorganic fertilizers) was at par with T10 (integrated nutrient system) for plant growth parameters, yield and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
100% NPK through inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome
plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptakee1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
T10e1
Setting
Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptake were noticed highest in treatment T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers) which was at par with T10 in which integrated nutrient system applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1505 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–299 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrated organic inputs with 50% reduced chemical fertilizer to sustain crop productivity and soil health.

Treatment
integrated application of organic inputs along with 50% reduced chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
sustaining crop productivity and enhance the soil healthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“integrated application of organic inputs along with 50% reduced chemical fertilizers was found to be best for sustaining crop productivity and enhance the soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1707 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.