Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices against Weed Control in Cluster Bean during Summer

V. G. Magar; A. M Musmade; B. T Patil; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment on the “Effect of Integrated Weed Management practices against weed control in cluster bean” was undertaken during summer 2015 and 2016.The various weeds observed in cluster bean crop during summer season were, viz., Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Commelina benghalensis, Parthenium hysterophorus, Portula caoleracea, Amarathus viridis, Trianthema portulacastrum, Euphorbia hrita, Diger amuricata, Panmicumis achne. Phylanthus niruri, Tridax procumbens and Dinebra retroflexa. Based on two year experimentation, it was found that, during summer of 2015, 2016 and pooled treatment weed free check reported significantly highest weed control efficiency than rest of all the treatments as there was total eradication of weeds which resulted in achieving 100% weed control efficiency. Post emergence application of herbicides in integration with the hand weeding gave better control of weeds during crop growth period which lowered the total weed population and ultimately resulted in achieving higher weed control efficiency. This could be explained based on the fact that, maximum uptake and better assimilation of herbicides was pronounced as soon as weeds emerged. Less weed intensity and its dry weight in integrated weed control treatments compared to weedy check may also one of the reasons of higher WCE with these treatments. Pooled data of two years indicated that significantly maximum pod yield was recorded due to increase values of yield attributing characters due to favorable environment in the root zone resulting absorption of more water and nutrient as less crop-weed competition during critical stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple weed species occurred in summer cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Outcome
weeds observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The various weeds observed in cluster bean crop during summer season were, viz., Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Commelina benghalensis, Parthenium hysterophorus, Portula caoleracea, Amarathus viridis, Trianthema portulacastrum, Euphorbia hrita, Diger amuricata, Panmicumis achne. Phylanthus niruri, Tridax procumbens and Dinebra retroflexa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free check achieved 100% weed control efficiency, significantly highest among treatments.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae1
Treatment
weed free checke0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
rest of all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment weed free check reported significantly highest weed control efficiency than rest of all the treatments as there was total eradication of weeds which resulted in achieving 100% weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence herbicide integrated with hand weeding lowered weed population and increased control efficiency.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae1
Treatment
Post emergence application of herbicides in integration with the hand weedinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total weed populatione0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post emergence application of herbicides in integration with the hand weeding gave better control of weeds during crop growth period which lowered the total weed population and ultimately resulted in achieving higher weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1045 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated treatments lowered weed intensity and dry weight relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae1
Treatment
integrated weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed intensity and its dry weighte0
Direction
Lesse0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less weed intensity and its dry weight in integrated weed control treatments compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year pooled data showed significantly maximum pod yield under reduced crop-weed competition.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled data of two years indicated that significantly maximum pod yield was recorded due to increase values of yield attributing characters due to favorable environment in the root zone resulting absorption of more water and nutrient as less crop-weed competition during critical stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1640 · show in text ↑
e1

“cluster bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–202 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.