Paper · 2019 · Progress in Plant Protection

Effect of a biostimulator and herbicidal protection on weed infestation as well as quantitative and qualitative parameters of spring wheat crop yield

Bożena Łozowicka; Rafał Konecki; Piotr Iwaniuk; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study was aimed to assess the effect of a biostimulator (S) and a herbicide (H) on weed infestation as well as qualitative and quantitative yield parameters of Mandaryna variety spring wheat. The experiment was conducted in north-eastern Poland conditions (2017–2018). The research consisted in using the herbicide (H) – sulfosulfuron and the biostimulator based on humic substance (S) in the H, S, H + S configuration. The herbicide was applied in the BBCH 31 phase, and the biostimulator – in BBCH 32, 47 and 69–71 phases. The treatments with the humic biostimulator reduced the effectiveness of herbicidal protection in weed biomass reduction. It was observed that weed biomass increased after using the biostimulator without any herbicide. In 2017, the highest wheat yield (4.5 t/ha) was obtained after herbicide application, and in 2018 after biostimulator application with the herbicide (5.0 t/ha). No significant effect of the biostimulator use on the qualitative parameters of spring wheat grains (protein, starch, Zeleny sedimentation index) was recorded. Celem pracy była ocena wpływu biostymulatora i herbicydu na zachwaszczenie oraz parametry jakościowe i ilościowe plonu pszenicy jarej odmiany Mandaryna. Doświadczenie przeprowadzono w warunkach północno-wschodniej Polski w latach 2017–2018. W badaniach zastosowano: herbicyd (H) – sulfosulfuron oraz biostymulator na bazie kwasów humusowych (S) w układzie: H, S, H + S. Herbicyd zaaplikowano w fazie BBCH 31, a biostymulator w fazach BBCH 32, 47, 69–71. Zabiegi biostymulatorem humusowym zmniejszyły skuteczność herbicydowej ochrony w ograniczaniu biomasy chwastów. W przypadku użycia biostymulatora bez wcześniejszego zastosowania herbicydu zaobserwowano zwiększenie biomasy chwastów. W 2017 roku najwyższy plon pszenicy (4,5 t/ha) uzyskano po zastosowaniu herbicydu, a w 2018 roku po aplikacji biostymulatora z herbicydem (5,0 t/ha). Nie odnotowano istotnego wpływu zastosowania biostymulatora na parametry jakościowe ziarna pszenicy jarej (białko, skrobia, wskaźnik sedymentacyjny Zelenyego).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic biostimulator reduced herbicide effectiveness against weed biomass.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
humic biostimulatore0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass reductione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
herbicidal protectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with the humic biostimulator reduced the effectiveness of herbicidal protection in weed biomass reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulator without herbicide increased weed biomass.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
biostimulator without any herbicidee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed biomass increased after using the biostimulator without any herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017 herbicide application gave the highest wheat yield, 4.5 t/ha.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.5 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, the highest wheat yield (4.5 t/ha) was obtained after herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018 biostimulator plus herbicide gave the highest wheat yield, 5.0 t/ha.

Treatment
biostimulator application with the herbicidee0
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.0 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2018 after biostimulator application with the herbicide (5.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulator had no significant effect on wheat grain protein, starch, or Zeleny sedimentation index.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
biostimulator usee0
Outcome
protein, starch, Zeleny sedimentation indexe0
Direction
No significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant effect of the biostimulator use on the qualitative parameters of spring wheat grains (protein, starch, Zeleny sedimentation index) was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1067 · show in text ↑

other · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.