Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Interactional Effects of Climate Change Factors on the Water Status, Photosynthetic Rate, and Metabolic Regulation in Peach

Sergio Jiménez; Masoud Fattahi; Khaoula Bedis; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental stress factors caused by climate change affect plant growth and crop production, and pose a growing threat to sustainable agriculture, especially for tree crops. In this context, we sought to investigate the responses to climate change of two Prunus rootstocks (GF677 and Adesoto) budded with Catherina peach cultivar. Plants were grown in 15 L pots in temperature gradient greenhouses for an 18 day acclimation period after which six treatments were applied: [CO2 levels (400 versus 700 µmol mol-1), temperature (ambient versus ambient + 4ºC), and water availability (well irrigated versus drought)]. After 23 days, the effects of stress were evaluated as changes in physiological and biochemical traits, including expression of relevant genes. Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in GF677 and Adesoto genotypes, however, elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently in both genotypes. The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions. The photosynthetic rates of plants grafted onto Adesoto were only affected by drought treatment. Furthermore, in GF677, elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought, whereas in Adesoto, the same condition produced acclimation in the photosynthetic rate. Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2 and drought stress in both genotypes, and the combination of these conditions improved photosynthetic water-use efficiency. Changes in the sugar content in leaves and roots were significantly different under the stress conditions in both rootstocks. Meanwhile, the expression of most of the assessed genes was significantly affected by treatment. Regarding genotypes, GF677 rootstock showed more changes at the molecular and transcriptomic level than did Adesoto rootstock. A coordinated shift was found between the physiological status and the transcriptomic responses. This study revealed adaptive responses to climate change at the physiological, metabolic, and transcriptomic levels in two Prunus rootstocks budded with ‘Catherina’. Overall, these results demonstrate the resilient capacity and plasticity of these contrasting genotypes, which can be further used to combat ongoing climate changes and support sustainable peach production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stem water potential in GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Stem water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in GF677 and Adesoto genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stem water potential in Adesoto.

Material
Adesotoe0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Stem water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in GF677 and Adesoto genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently between GF677 and Adesoto.

Treatment
elevated CO2 and temperaturee0
Outcome
plant water contente0
Qualifier
differently in both genotypese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased photosynthetic rate in plants grafted on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature decreased photosynthetic rate in plants grafted on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased photosynthetic rate in plants grafted on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate in plants grafted on Adesoto was affected only by drought.

Material
Adesotoe0
Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rates of plants grafted onto Adesoto were only affected by drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought in GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
effect of droughte0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in GF677, elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 under drought produced acclimation in photosynthetic rate in Adesoto.

Material
Adesotoe0
Treatment
same conditione0
Outcome
acclimation in the photosynthetic ratee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Adesoto, the same condition produced acclimation in the photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 decreased stomatal conductance in both genotypes.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2 and drought stress in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased stomatal conductance in both genotypes.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2 and drought stress in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high CO2 and drought improved photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

Treatment
combination of these conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic water-use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of these conditions improved photosynthetic water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf sugar content differed significantly under stress conditions in both rootstocks.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
stress conditionse0
Outcome
sugar content in leavese0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the sugar content in leaves and roots were significantly different under the stress conditions in both rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root sugar content differed significantly under stress conditions in both rootstocks.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
stress conditionse0
Outcome
sugar content in leaves and rootse0
Direction
differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the sugar content in leaves and roots were significantly different under the stress conditions in both rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment significantly affected expression of most assessed genes.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
expression of most of the assessed genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the expression of most of the assessed genes was significantly affected by treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GF677 showed more molecular and transcriptomic changes than Adesoto.

Material
GF677e0
Outcome
changes at the molecular and transcriptomic levele0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Adesotoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GF677 rootstock showed more changes at the molecular and transcriptomic level than did Adesoto rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological status and transcriptomic responses shifted together.

Outcome
coordinated shifte0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A coordinated shift was found between the physiological status and the transcriptomic responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.