Paper · 2005 · Functional Plant Biology

Characteristics of CO2 exchange between peach stems and the atmosphere

Giorgio A. Alessio; Fabrizio Pietrini; Federico Brilli; et al.

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gas exchange by stems is dominated by respiratory CO2 emission, but photosynthetic CO2 uptake might also occur in stem bark. We show that light-dependent CO2 uptake was present and often exceeded CO2 release by respiration in illuminated current-year peach (Prunus persica L.) stems. Respiration of peach stems, as detected by 12CO2 release into air in which the natural concentration of 12CO2 was replaced with 13CO2, was lower in the light than in the dark, but this accounted for only a fraction of the observed total CO2 uptake by illuminated stems. Stem photosynthesis was saturated at low light and was negatively affected by elevated assay temperatures (30°C), especially when combined with light intensities above saturation. An inefficient mechanism of heat dissipation by transpiration in stomata-free stems might help explain this effect. Photosynthesis was rapidly stimulated and the electron transport rate was reduced when photorespiration was suppressed by exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen. The time-course of these changes was closely associated with a transient burst of CO2 uptake concurrent with a reduced inhibition of fluorescence yield. Photosynthesis was also stimulated by exposure to elevated (twice ambient) CO2 concentration. These combined measurements of gas exchange and fluorescence suggested that (a) photorespiration may also be active in the bark of peach stems, (b) O2 and CO2 concentrations in the bark of peach stems may be similar to ambient concentrations, (c) a large amount of electron transport unrelated to photosynthesis and photorespiration may also be present in peach stems, and (d) stem photosynthesis may be enhanced under future atmospheric conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-dependent CO2 uptake was present in illuminated peach stems and often exceeded respiratory CO2 release.

Outcome
CO2 uptakee1
Qualifier
exceeded CO2 release by respiratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO2 uptake was present and often exceeded CO2 release by respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Respiration of peach stems was lower in the light than in the dark, but accounted for only a fraction of the total CO2 uptake.

Treatment
lighte2
Outcome
Respiratione0
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
accounted for only a fraction of the observed total CO2 uptakee3
Comparator
darke2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“was lower in the light than in the dark”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–458 · show in text ↑
e3

“accounted for only a fraction of the observed total CO2 uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–531 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem photosynthesis of peach was saturated at low light.

Outcome
Stem photosynthesise4
Qualifier
saturated at low lighte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stem photosynthesis was saturated at low light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated assay temperature negatively affected stem photosynthesis of peach, especially at light intensities above saturation.

Treatment
elevated assay temperaturese5
Outcome
Stem photosynthesise4
Direction
negatively affectede5
Qualifier
especially when combined with light intensities above saturatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stem photosynthesis was saturated at low light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–600 · show in text ↑
e5

“was negatively affected by elevated assay temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–659 · show in text ↑
e6

“especially when combined with light intensities above saturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen rapidly stimulated photosynthesis of peach stems by suppressing photorespiration.

Treatment
exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygene1
Outcome
Photosynthesise7
Direction
stimulatede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e7

“Photosynthesis was rapidly stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“when photorespiration was suppressed by exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen reduced the electron transport rate of peach stems.

Treatment
exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygene1
Outcome
electron transport ratee2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“when photorespiration was suppressed by exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1002 · show in text ↑
e2

“the electron transport rate was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–931 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The time course of the low-oxygen effect was associated with a transient burst of CO2 uptake in peach stems.

Treatment
low (2 kPa) oxygene1
Outcome
transient burst of CO2 uptakee2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“when photorespiration was suppressed by exposure to low (2 kPa) oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1002 · show in text ↑
e2

“was closely associated with a transient burst of CO2 uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated (twice ambient) CO2 stimulated photosynthesis of peach stems.

Treatment
elevated (twice ambient) CO2 concentratione1
Outcome
Photosynthesise1
Direction
stimulatede1
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthesis was also stimulated by exposure to elevated (twice ambient) CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1249 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photorespiration may also be active in the bark of peach stems.

Organ / stage
barke0
Outcome
photorespiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photorespiration may also be active in the bark of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1393 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O2 and CO2 concentrations in the bark of peach stems may be similar to ambient concentrations.

Outcome
O2 and CO2 concentrationse0
Qualifier
similar to ambient concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O2 and CO2 concentrations in the bark of peach stems may be similar to ambient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1492 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large amount of electron transport unrelated to photosynthesis and photorespiration may be present in peach stems.

Outcome
electron transporte0
Qualifier
unrelated to photosynthesis and photorespiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a large amount of electron transport unrelated to photosynthesis and photorespiration may also be present in peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1618 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Stem photosynthesis of peach may be enhanced under future atmospheric conditions.

Treatment
future atmospheric conditionse1
Outcome
stem photosynthesise1
Direction
enhancede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Respiration of peach stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem photosynthesis may be enhanced under future atmospheric conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1699 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.