Abstract
This research was carried out to determine the rates of protein and oil production and fatty acid composition and their correlation coefficients in four safflower cultivars (Remzibey, Dincer, Balci, and Yenice) sown in the autumn and spring from 2013 to 2015. The experiment was carried out using split plots in a randomized block design and was replicated 3 times. The study found protein production rates between 15.20 and 18.08%, oil production rates between 24.58 and 31.99%, palmitic acid production rates between 5.93 and 7.01%, stearic acid production rates between 2.13 and 2.53%, oleic acid production rates between 12.08 and 31.58%, linoleic acid production rates between 78.61 and 59.08%, and linolenic acid production rates between 0.11 and 0.15%. Higher seed oil content values were obtained from spring sowing compared to autumn sowing (27.42% and 26.10%), and, in terms of both the evaluated sowing times and cultivars, the highest oil production rates were found in the Balci cultivar (32.20% and 31.78%) for both sowing times. It was determined that there is a positive and significant (r=0.476⁎⁎) relationship between oil with protein production rates but a negative and significant relationship between oil and linolenic acid production rates (r=-0.728⁎⁎). The oleic acid production rate was strongly negatively and significantly correlated with the linoleic acid production rate (r=-0.997⁎⁎).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower protein production rates ranged from 15.20 to 18.08%.
- Taxon
- Safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Outcome
- protein production ratese0
- Value
- 15.20 and 18.08%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“protein production rates between 15.20 and 18.08%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower oil production rates ranged from 24.58 to 31.99%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oil production ratese0
- Value
- 24.58 and 31.99%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil production rates between 24.58 and 31.99%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower palmitic acid production rates ranged from 5.93 to 7.01%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- palmitic acid production ratese0
- Value
- 5.93 and 7.01%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“palmitic acid production rates between 5.93 and 7.01%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower stearic acid production rates ranged from 2.13 to 2.53%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- stearic acid production ratese0
- Value
- 2.13 and 2.53%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“stearic acid production rates between 2.13 and 2.53%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower oleic acid production rates ranged from 12.08 to 31.58%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oleic acid production ratese0
- Value
- 12.08 and 31.58%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oleic acid production rates between 12.08 and 31.58%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower linoleic acid production rates ranged from 78.61 to 59.08%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- linoleic acid production ratese0
- Value
- 78.61 and 59.08%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“linoleic acid production rates between 78.61 and 59.08%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower linolenic acid production rates ranged from 0.11 to 0.15%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- linolenic acid production ratese0
- Value
- 0.11 and 0.15%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“linolenic acid production rates between 0.11 and 0.15%”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring sowing produced higher safflower seed oil content than autumn sowing, 27.42% versus 26.10%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- spring sowinge0
- Outcome
- seed oil contente0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 27.42%e0
- Qualifier
- 26.10%e0
- Comparator
- autumn sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher seed oil content values were obtained from spring sowing compared to autumn sowing (27.42% and 26.10%)”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Balci had the highest oil production rate for one sowing time, 32.20%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Balci cultivare0
- Outcome
- oil production ratese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 32.20%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest oil production rates were found in the Balci cultivar (32.20% and 31.78%) for both sowing times”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Balci had the highest oil production rate for the other sowing time, 31.78%.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Balci cultivare0
- Outcome
- oil production ratese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 31.78%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest oil production rates were found in the Balci cultivar (32.20% and 31.78%) for both sowing times”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower oil and protein production rates had a positive significant correlation of r=0.476⁎⁎.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oile0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Value
- r=0.476⁎⁎e0
- Comparator
- protein production ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there is a positive and significant (r=0.476⁎⁎) relationship between oil with protein production rates”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower oil and linolenic acid production rates had a negative significant correlation of r=-0.728⁎⁎.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oile0
- Direction
- negativee0
- Value
- r=-0.728⁎⁎e0
- Comparator
- linolenic acid production ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“negative and significant relationship between oil and linolenic acid production rates (r=-0.728⁎⁎)”
t0“Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Safflower oleic and linoleic acid production rates had a strong negative significant correlation of r=-0.997⁎⁎.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oleic acid production ratee0
- Direction
- negativelye0
- Value
- r=-0.997⁎⁎e0
- Comparator
- linoleic acid production ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The oleic acid production rate was strongly negatively and significantly correlated with the linoleic acid production rate (r=-0.997⁎⁎).”
t0“Safflower”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.