Paper · 2020 · Cereal Chemistry

Effects of dynamic low temperature during the grain filling stage on starch morphological structure, physicochemical properties, and eating quality of soft japonica rice

Yajie Hu; Luan Li; Jinyu Tian; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives Temperature during the grain filling stage is the critical environmental factor affecting rice quality and starch physicochemical properties. Two soft japonica rice varieties were used to investigate starch morphological structure, gelatinization, and pasting properties, as well as the overall sensory quality of cooked rice under different ripening dynamic temperatures. Findings Compared to normal temperature (NT), dynamic low temperature (LT) during the grain filling stage increased amylose content and significantly influenced the crystalline structure of starch. These structural changes included the reduction in the relative crystallinity, IR ratio of 1,045/1,022 cm −1 , the lamellar peak intensity, and lamellar distance. With regard to pasting properties, LT increased the setback and decreased the peak, trough, final viscosities, and breakdown. However, LT reduced gelatinization temperature and enthalpy. For eating quality, the palatability of cooked rice under LT decreased, which was related to higher hardness as well as lower stickiness and gel consistency. Conclusions Low temperature during grain filling led to the deterioration of eating quality of cooked rice, and this deterioration could be attributed to high amylose content, low pasting viscosity, and reduced gel consistency. Significance and novelty The mean temperature at 22°C during the grain filling stage improved eating quality in soft japonica rice by enhancing pasting properties and gel consistency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased rice amylose content.

Treatment
dynamic low temperature (LT)e0
Outcome
amylose contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal temperature (NT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to normal temperature (NT), dynamic low temperature (LT) during the grain filling stage increased amylose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced starch relative crystallinity, IR ratio and lamellar peak intensity.

Outcome
relative crystallinity, IR ratio of 1,045/1,022 cm −1 , the lamellar peak intensitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These structural changes included the reduction in the relative crystallinity, IR ratio of 1,045/1,022 cm −1 , the lamellar peak intensity, and lamellar distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced starch lamellar distance.

Outcome
lamellar distancee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These structural changes included the reduction in the relative crystallinity, IR ratio of 1,045/1,022 cm −1 , the lamellar peak intensity, and lamellar distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature increased starch setback.

Treatment
LTe0
Outcome
setbacke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LT increased the setback and decreased the peak, trough, final viscosities, and breakdown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased peak, trough and final starch viscosities.

Treatment
LTe0
Outcome
peak, trough, final viscositiese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LT increased the setback and decreased the peak, trough, final viscosities, and breakdown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased starch breakdown.

Treatment
LTe0
Outcome
breakdowne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LT increased the setback and decreased the peak, trough, final viscosities, and breakdown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced gelatinization temperature and enthalpy.

Treatment
LTe0
Outcome
gelatinization temperature and enthalpye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LT reduced gelatinization temperature and enthalpy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature decreased cooked rice palatability.

Treatment
LTe0
Outcome
palatabilitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the palatability of cooked rice under LT decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1026 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature was associated with higher hardness and lower stickiness and gel consistency.

Outcome
hardnesse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was related to higher hardness as well as lower stickiness and gel consistency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“soft japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A mean grain-filling temperature of 22°C improved soft japonica rice eating quality.

Taxon
soft japonica ricee0
Treatment
mean temperature at 22°Ce0
Outcome
eating qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mean temperature at 22°C during the grain filling stage improved eating quality in soft japonica rice by enhancing pasting properties and gel consistency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1525 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

cold · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.