Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research

IIntegrated weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) through combinations of seed priming and reduced dosages of various commonly used herbicides

Diyanat, Marjan; Ghasemkhan-Ghajar, Fereidoon

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2017 and 2018 to evaluate the efficacy of herbicides NICOSULFURON and EPTC alone or in combination with seed priming on weed control and corn yield. NICOSULFURON (80 g a.i. ha‒1) was applied at four- to six-leaf stage of corn as post-emergence and EPTC (4920 g a.i. ha‒1) applied as pre-plant incorporation (PPI). Among the herbicide treatments, the lowest total weed biomass was observed in plots treated with prime + EPTC PPI at ½ recommended dose followed by one hand weeding and NICOSULFURON applied at label recommended dose or 33% reduced dose integrated with seed priming, while the least performance was observed in plots treated with EPTC alone. Weed biomass reduction by seed priming alone was 32% (average of two years) compared with control. The highest grain and biological yield were observed in weed free plots and hand hoeing three times, followed by prime + EPTC followed one hand-hoeing and NICOSULFURON at recommended rate and at 33% reduced dose integrated with seed priming. The present study demonstrated that seed priming can improve the weed competitiveness of corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming plus half-dose EPTC and one hand weeding yielded the lowest total weed biomass.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
prime + EPTC PPI at ½ recommended dose followed by one hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest total weed biomass was observed in plots treated with prime + EPTC PPI at ½ recommended dose followed by one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nicosulfuron at the recommended dose or a 33% reduced dose with priming followed the best weed-control regime.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
NICOSULFURON applied at label recommended dose or 33% reduced dose integrated with seed priminge0
Outcome
least performancee0
Comparator
EPTC alonee0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by one hand weeding and NICOSULFURON applied at label recommended dose or 33% reduced dose integrated with seed priming, while the least performance was observed in plots treated with EPTC alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming alone reduced weed biomass by 32% versus control across two years.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
seed priming alonee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
Weed biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
average of two yearse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed biomass reduction by seed priming alone was 32% (average of two years) compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the highest grain and biological yields.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
weed free plotse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and biological yield were observed in weed free plots and hand hoeing three times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand hoeings produced the highest grain and biological yields.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
hand hoeing three timese0
Outcome
grain and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and biological yield were observed in weed free plots and hand hoeing three times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming plus EPTC and hand hoeing followed the highest yield regimes.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Outcome
prime + EPTC followed one hand-hoeinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by prime + EPTC followed one hand-hoeing and NICOSULFURON at recommended rate and at 33% reduced dose integrated with seed priming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that priming can improve corn competitiveness against weeds.

Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
weed competitiveness of corne0
Direction
improvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study demonstrated that seed priming can improve the weed competitiveness of corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1130 · show in text ↑

EPTC · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.