Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Effect of zinc and zinc solubilizing bacteria on the yield and nutrient uptake by maize in calcareous soil

Bimal Glory Babu; P Malathi

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Investigations were conducted for assessing the impact of different sources and levels of zinc and zinc solubilizing bacteria on the yield and nutrient uptake by maize in calcareous soil. The study was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu on TNAU maize hybrid CO 6. The experiment was laid out in factorial completely randomized design (FCRD) with three factors replicated thrice. The treatments consisted of two sources of Zn [ZnS4Oand Zn3 (PO4)2] with three levels (0, 5, 7.5 kg Zn/ha) with and without zinc solubilizing bacteria (ZSB). ZnSO4 application performed better than Zn3(PO4)2 in improving the grain and stover yield. Among the levels of Zn, 7.5 kg Zn/ha registered significantly highest grain and stover yield. When compared to the treatments without ZSB inoculation, 4.2 per cent increase in mean grain and stover yield was registered with ZSB inoculation. With respect to uptake of nutrients, ZSB showed a significant increase in the grain, stover and total uptake of P, K, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu. In addition sources of Zn also significantly increased the P uptake in grain and stover and Zn3 (PO4)2 registered higher P uptake than ZnSO. Sources and levels of Zn had no effect on the uptake of K, Fe, Mn and Cu whereas Zn uptake increased with increase in the levels of Zn and the highest uptake of Zn by maize was observed when Zn was applied at 7.5 kg/ha as ZnSO4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 application increased grain and stover yield more than Zn3(PO4)2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZnSO4 applicatione1
Outcome
grain and stover yielde1
Direction
performed bettere1
Comparator
Zn3(PO4)2e1
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“ZnSO4 application performed better than Zn3(PO4)2 in improving the grain and stover yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 7.5 kg Zn/ha level gave the highest grain and stover yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
7.5 kg Zn/hae2
Outcome
grain and stover yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the levels of Zn, 7.5 kg Zn/ha registered significantly highest grain and stover yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZSB inoculation increased mean grain and stover yield by 4.2 per cent compared with no ZSB inoculation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZSB inoculatione3
Interactor
ZSBe3symbiont
Outcome
mean grain and stover yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
4.2 per cente3
Comparator
treatments without ZSB inoculatione3
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“When compared to the treatments without ZSB inoculation, 4.2 per cent increase in mean grain and stover yield was registered with ZSB inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZSB significantly increased total uptake of P, K and Zn in grain and stover.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZSBe4
Interactor
ZSBe4symbiont
Outcome
total uptake of P, K, Zne4
Direction
increasee4
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“ZSB showed a significant increase in the grain, stover and total uptake of P, K, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZSB significantly increased total uptake of Fe, Mn and Cu in grain and stover.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ZSBe4
Interactor
ZSBe4symbiont
Outcome
Fe, Mn and Cue4
Direction
increasee4
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“ZSB showed a significant increase in the grain, stover and total uptake of P, K, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sources of Zn significantly increased P uptake in grain and stover.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sources of Zne5
Outcome
P uptake in grain and stovere5
Direction
increasede5
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“sources of Zn also significantly increased the P uptake in grain and stover and Zn3 (PO4)2 registered higher P uptake than ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn3(PO4)2 gave higher P uptake than ZnSO4.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn3 (PO4)2e5
Outcome
P uptakee5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
ZnSOe5
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“sources of Zn also significantly increased the P uptake in grain and stover and Zn3 (PO4)2 registered higher P uptake than ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sources and levels of Zn had no effect on uptake of K, Fe, Mn and Cu.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Sources and levels of Zne6
Outcome
uptake of K, Fe, Mn and Cue6
Direction
no effecte6
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sources and levels of Zn had no effect on the uptake of K, Fe, Mn and Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn uptake increased with increasing Zn levels.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
levels of Zne0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zn uptake increased with increase in the levels of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize Zn uptake occurred when Zn was applied at 7.5 kg/ha as ZnSO4.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn was applied at 7.5 kg/ha as ZnSO4e7
Outcome
uptake of Zn by maizee7
Direction
higheste7
Setting
calcareous soilt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–106 · show in text ↑
e7

“the highest uptake of Zn by maize was observed when Zn was applied at 7.5 kg/ha as ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1411 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.