Paper · 2020 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Blue Radiation Interacts with Green Radiation to Influence Growth and Predominantly Controls Quality Attributes of Lettuce

Qingwu Meng; Jennifer Boldt; Erik S. Runkle

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Adding green [G (500–600 nm)] radiation to blue [B (400–500 nm)] and red [R (600–700 nm)] radiation creates white radiation and improves crop inspection at indoor farms. Although G radiation can drive photosynthesis and elicit the shade-avoidance response, its effects on plant growth and morphology have been inconsistent. We postulated G radiation would counter the suppression of crop growth and promotion of secondary metabolism by B radiation depending on the B photon flux density ( PFD ). Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse. At the same photosynthetic photon flux density [ PPFD (400–700 nm)] of 180 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 , plants were grown under warm-white LEDs or increasing B PFD s at 0, 20, 60, and 100 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 with or without substituting the remaining R radiation with 60 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 of G radiation. Biomass and leaf expansion were negatively correlated with the B PFD with or without G radiation. For example, increasing the B PFD decreased fresh and dry mass by up to 63% and 54%, respectively. The inclusion of G radiation did not affect shoot dry mass at 0 or 20 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 of B radiation, but it decreased it at 60 or 100 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 of B radiation. Results suggest that the shade-avoidance response is strongly elicited by low B radiation and repressed by high B radiation, rendering G radiation ineffective at controlling morphology. Moreover, substituting R radiation with G radiation likely reduced the quantum yield. Otherwise, G radiation barely influenced morphology, foliage coloration, essential nutrients, or sensory attributes regardless of the B PFD . Increasing the B PFD increased red foliage coloration and the concentrations of several macronutrients (e.g., nitrogen and magnesium) and micronutrients (e.g., zinc and copper). Consumers preferred plants grown under sole-source lighting over those grown in the greenhouse, which were more bitter and less acceptable, flavorful, and sweet. We concluded that lettuce phenotypes are primarily controlled by B radiation and that G radiation maintains or suppresses lettuce growth depending on the B PFD .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass and leaf expansion were negatively correlated with blue photon flux density in lettuce, with or without green radiation.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Material
Rouxaie1
Treatment
B PFDe2
Outcome
Biomass and leaf expansione2
Direction
negatively correlatede2
Setting
growth roome1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biomass and leaf expansion were negatively correlated with the B PFD with or without G radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue PFD decreased fresh mass of lettuce by up to 63%.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B PFDe3
Outcome
fresh and dry masse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
63%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e3

“increasing the B PFD decreased fresh and dry mass by up to 63% and 54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue PFD decreased dry mass of lettuce by up to 54%.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B PFDe3
Outcome
fresh and dry masse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
54%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e3

“increasing the B PFD decreased fresh and dry mass by up to 63% and 54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green radiation did not affect shoot dry mass of lettuce at 0 or 20 blue PFD.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
G radiatione4
Outcome
shoot dry masse4
Direction
did not affecte4
Qualifier
at 0 or 20e4
Comparator
without G radiatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biomass and leaf expansion were negatively correlated with the B PFD with or without G radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1050 · show in text ↑
e4

“The inclusion of G radiation did not affect shoot dry mass at 0 or 20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green radiation decreased shoot dry mass of lettuce at 60 or 100 blue PFD.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
G radiatione4
Outcome
shoot dry masse4
Direction
decreasede5
Qualifier
at 60 or 100e5
Comparator
without G radiatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biomass and leaf expansion were negatively correlated with the B PFD with or without G radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1050 · show in text ↑
e4

“The inclusion of G radiation did not affect shoot dry mass at 0 or 20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1220 · show in text ↑
e5

“but it decreased it at 60 or 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1285 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shade-avoidance response of lettuce is strongly elicited by low blue radiation and repressed by high blue radiation.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
low B radiatione6
Outcome
shade-avoidance responsee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results suggest that the shade-avoidance response is strongly elicited by low B radiation and repressed by high B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting red radiation with green radiation likely reduced the quantum yield of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
substituting R radiation with G radiatione7
Outcome
quantum yielde7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
R radiatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e7

“substituting R radiation with G radiation likely reduced the quantum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green radiation barely influenced lettuce morphology, foliage coloration or essential nutrients.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
G radiatione0
Outcome
morphology, foliage coloration, essential nutrientse0
Direction
barely influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“G radiation barely influenced morphology, foliage coloration, essential nutrients, or sensory attributes regardless of the B PFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green radiation barely influenced lettuce sensory attributes.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
G radiatione0
Outcome
sensory attributese0
Direction
barely influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“G radiation barely influenced morphology, foliage coloration, essential nutrients, or sensory attributes regardless of the B PFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue PFD increased red foliage coloration of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B PFDe0
Outcome
red foliage coloratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing the B PFD increased red foliage coloration and the concentrations of several macronutrients (e.g., nitrogen and magnesium) and micronutrients (e.g., zinc and copper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue PFD increased macronutrient concentrations (nitrogen and magnesium) in lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B PFDe0
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
concentrations of several macronutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing the B PFD increased red foliage coloration and the concentrations of several macronutrients (e.g., nitrogen and magnesium) and micronutrients (e.g., zinc and copper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue PFD increased micronutrient concentrations (zinc and copper) in lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B PFDe0
Compound
zinc and coppere0
Outcome
micronutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing the B PFD increased red foliage coloration and the concentrations of several macronutrients (e.g., nitrogen and magnesium) and micronutrients (e.g., zinc and copper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consumers preferred lettuce grown under sole-source lighting over lettuce grown in the greenhouse.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
sole-source lightinge0
Outcome
Consumers preferrede0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Consumers preferred plants grown under sole-source lighting over those grown in the greenhouse, which were more bitter and less acceptable, flavorful, and sweet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse-grown lettuce was more bitter than sole-source-grown lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
greenhousee0
Outcome
bittere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole-source lightinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Consumers preferred plants grown under sole-source lighting over those grown in the greenhouse, which were more bitter and less acceptable, flavorful, and sweet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse-grown lettuce was less acceptable, flavorful and sweet than sole-source-grown lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
greenhousee0
Outcome
acceptable, flavorful, and sweete0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
sole-source lightinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“Consumers preferred plants grown under sole-source lighting over those grown in the greenhouse, which were more bitter and less acceptable, flavorful, and sweet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2070 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce phenotypes are primarily controlled by blue radiation.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
B radiatione0
Outcome
lettuce phenotypese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“We concluded that lettuce phenotypes are primarily controlled by B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2072–2148 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green radiation maintains or suppresses lettuce growth depending on blue PFD.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae1
Treatment
G radiatione0
Outcome
lettuce growthe0
Direction
maintains or suppressese0
Qualifier
depending on the B PFDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ‘Rouxai’) was grown in a growth room under nine sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) treatments with a 20-hour photoperiod or in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–664 · show in text ↑
e0

“G radiation maintains or suppresses lettuce growth depending on the B PFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2158–2231 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

43 papers: 27 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

radiation · quality: general · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

light · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 243 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 243 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.