Paper · 2020 · HortScience

Calcium Application Method Impacts Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers

Katherine Bennett; Mary Vargo; Guido Schnabel; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Two application methods of calcium (Ca), fertigation and spray, were investigated regarding their effects on Botrytis blight on petunia ( Petunia × hybrida ) flowers. Plants were grown for 6 weeks with three nutrient solutions consisting of 0, 100, or 200 mg·L −1 Ca and weekly calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ) sprays of 0, 750, or 1500 mg·L −1 Ca for a total of nine treatment combinations. Flowers were harvested, inoculated with Botrytis spores, placed in humidity chambers, and evaluated for Botrytis blight severity. Disease severity decreased by 57% and 70% when flowers were treated with Ca spray applications of 750 and 1500 mg·L −1 Ca, respectively; however, no change in disease severity occurred across the Ca fertigation applications. Ca concentration in the flower petal tissue increased with the Ca spray applications: the flower petal Ca concentration increased from 0.26% to 0.65% of tissue dry mass (DM) as the Ca spray application rate increased from 0 to 1500 mg·L −1 . However, no change was observed across the Ca fertigation treatments. Leaf tissue Ca concentration increased from 2.1% to 3.2% DM as the fertigation solution increased from 0 to 200 mg·L −1 Ca, whereas spray application had no significant effects of leaf tissue Ca concentration. The results demonstrate that spray application is a more effective technique than fertigation application to provide higher Ca tissue concentrations in flowers, and that the Ca concentration in flower petal tissue is an important consideration when evaluating tissue susceptibility to Botrytis blight. Because of the high rate of fungicide resistance to Botrytis cinerea found in commercial greenhouses, spray applications of CaCl 2 are an important disease management tool for commercial growers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca spray applications decreased Botrytis blight severity by 57%.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Ca spray applicationse1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytist0pathogen
Outcome
Disease severitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
57%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease severity decreased by 57% and 70% when flowers were treated with Ca spray applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca spray applications at the higher rate decreased Botrytis blight severity by 70%.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Ca spray applicationse1
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytist0pathogen
Outcome
Disease severitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
70%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease severity decreased by 57% and 70% when flowers were treated with Ca spray applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No change in Botrytis blight severity occurred across Ca fertigation applications.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Ca fertigation applicationse2
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytist0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye2
Direction
no changee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“no change in disease severity occurred across the Ca fertigation applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca spray applications increased the flower petal Ca concentration from 0.26% to 0.65% of tissue dry mass.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Ca spray applicationse4
Outcome
flower petal Ca concentratione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
0.26% to 0.65%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“the flower petal Ca concentration increased from 0.26% to 0.65% of tissue dry mass (DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–914 · show in text ↑
e4

“Ca concentration in the flower petal tissue increased with the Ca spray applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No change in flower petal Ca concentration occurred across Ca fertigation treatments.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Ca fertigation treatmentse5
Outcome
flower petal Ca concentratione3
Direction
no changee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“the flower petal Ca concentration increased from 0.26% to 0.65% of tissue dry mass (DM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–914 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, no change was observed across the Ca fertigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation solution increased leaf tissue Ca concentration from 2.1% to 3.2% of dry mass.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
fertigation solutione6
Outcome
Leaf tissue Ca concentratione6
Direction
increasede6
Value
2.1% to 3.2%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e6

“Leaf tissue Ca concentration increased from 2.1% to 3.2% DM as the fertigation solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray application had no significant effect on leaf tissue Ca concentration.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
spray applicatione7
Outcome
leaf tissue Ca concentratione7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas spray application had no significant effects of leaf tissue Ca concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray application was more effective than fertigation application for higher Ca tissue concentrations in flowers.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
spray applicatione1
Outcome
Ca tissue concentrations in flowerse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
fertigation applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“spray application is a more effective technique than fertigation application to provide higher Ca tissue concentrations in flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1422 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Petal Ca concentration is an important consideration when evaluating tissue susceptibility to Botrytis blight.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Compound
Cae1
Outcome
tissue susceptibility to Botrytis blighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Ca concentration in flower petal tissue is an important consideration when evaluating tissue susceptibility to Botrytis blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1563 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spray applications of CaCl2 are an important disease management tool for commercial growers.

Taxon
PetuniaPetuniat0
Outcome
disease management toole1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Botrytis Blight Severity on Petunia Flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“spray applications of CaCl 2 are an important disease management tool for commercial growers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1759 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · Botrytis · Petunia (petunia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Petunia (petunia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · phenology · Petunia (petunia)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Petunia (petunia)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Petunia (petunia)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.