Paper · 2020 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Screening of antagonistic Trichoderma strains and their application for controlling stalk rot in maize

Zhi-xiang LU; Guang-ping TU; Ting ZHANG; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Maize is one of the major crops in China, but maize stalk rot occurs nationwide and has become one of the major challenges in maize production in China. In order to find an environment-friendly and feasible technology to control this disease, a Trichoderma-based biocontrol agent was selected. Forty-eight strains with various inhibition activities to Fusarium graminearum, and Fusarium verticillioides were tested. A group of Trichoderma strains (DLY31, SG3403, DLY1303 and GDFS1009) were found to provide an inhibition rate to pathogen growth in vitro of over 70%. These strains also prevented pathogen infection over 65% and promoted the maize seedling growth for the main root in vivo by over 50%. Due to its advantage in antifungal activity against pathogens and promotion activity to maize, Trichoderma asperellum GDSF1009 was selected as the most promising strain of the biocontrol agent in the Trichoderma spectrum. Pot experiments showed that the Trichoderma agent at 2–3 g/pot could achieve the best control of seedling stalk rot and promotion of maize seedling growth. In the field experiments, 8–10 g/hole was able to achieve over 65% control to stalk rot, and yield increased by 2–11%. In the case of natural morbidity, the control efficiency ranged from 27.23 to 48.84%, and the rate of yield increase reached 11.70%, with a dosage of Trichoderma granules at 75 kg ha−1. Based on these results, we concluded that the Trichoderma agent is a promising biocontrol approach to stalk rot in maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four Trichoderma strains inhibited pathogen growth in vitro by over 70%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Trichoderma strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition rate to pathogen growthe0
Value
over 70%e0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A group of Trichoderma strains (DLY31, SG3403, DLY1303 and GDFS1009) were found to provide an inhibition rate to pathogen growth in vitro of over 70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains prevented pathogen infection by over 65%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
These strainse0
Outcome
pathogen infectione0
Direction
preventede0
Value
over 65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“These strains also prevented pathogen infection over 65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains promoted maize seedling main root growth by over 50%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
main roote0
Outcome
maize seedling growth for the main roote0
Direction
promotede0
Value
over 50%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoted the maize seedling growth for the main root in vivo by over 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–700 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma asperellum GDSF1009 was selected as the most promising strain.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Trichoderma asperellum GDSF1009Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
most promising straine0
Comparator
Trichoderma spectrume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trichoderma asperellum GDSF1009 was selected as the most promising strain of the biocontrol agent in the Trichoderma spectrum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2–3 g/pot, the agent gave the best seedling stalk rot control and seedling growth promotion in pots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma agent at 2–3 g/pote0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of seedling stalk rot and promotion of maize seedling growthe0
Direction
beste0
Setting
Pot experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pot experiments showed that the Trichoderma agent at 2–3 g/pot could achieve the best control of seedling stalk rot and promotion of maize seedling growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8–10 g/hole in fields, the agent gave over 65% stalk rot control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
8–10 g/holee0
Outcome
control to stalk rote0
Direction
controle0
Value
over 65%e0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the field experiments, 8–10 g/hole was able to achieve over 65% control to stalk rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application at 8–10 g/hole increased yield by 2–11%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
8–10 g/holee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2–11%e0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the field experiments, 8–10 g/hole was able to achieve over 65% control to stalk rot, and yield increased by 2–11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under natural morbidity, granules at 75 kg ha−1 controlled stalk rot by 27.23 to 48.84%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma granules at 75 kg ha−1e0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control efficiencye0
Direction
controle0
Value
27.23 to 48.84%e0
Qualifier
natural morbiditye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the case of natural morbidity, the control efficiency ranged from 27.23 to 48.84%, and the rate of yield increase reached 11.70%, with a dosage of Trichoderma granules at 75 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under natural morbidity, granules at 75 kg ha−1 increased yield by 11.70%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Trichoderma granules at 75 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11.70%e0
Qualifier
natural morbiditye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the case of natural morbidity, the control efficiency ranged from 27.23 to 48.84%, and the rate of yield increase reached 11.70%, with a dosage of Trichoderma granules at 75 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1384 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.