Paper · 2002 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Replant problems in South Tyrol: role of fungal pathogens and microbial populations in conventional and organic apple orchards

L. Manici; Markus Kelderer; G. Erschbaumer; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

South Tyrol, the main Italian apple growing area, is characterised by an highly intensive soil cultivation. Previous investigations shows the existence of replant disorders although it has not been evaluated which are the main causes. A survey has been carried out in this area with two main aims I) to evaluate the role of soil borne pathogens in apple replant disease and II) to evaluate the effect of soil management toward soil borne pathogens causing replant diseases. The experimental sites were chosen in order to obtain three couples of contiguous conventional and organic apple orchards. Soil sickness test with young apple plants gave a significant growth reduction in all soil samples if compared to a peat control. Among all root colonising fungi (Fusarium oxysporum, F. solani, Aphanomyces sp., Cy/incrocarpon sp., Rhizoctonia sp. and Pythium sp.) some Rhizoctonia solani strains and all Pythium spp. were the most pathogenic. In all cases organic management seems to reduce the soil sickness severity caused by root rot fungal pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All orchard soil samples significantly reduced young apple plant growth compared with peat.

Treatment
all soil samplese0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
peat controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil sickness test with young apple plants gave a significant growth reduction in all soil samples if compared to a peat control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some Rhizoctonia solani strains were among the most pathogenic root colonizers.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
most pathogenice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some Rhizoctonia solani strains and all Pythium spp. were the most pathogenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All Pythium spp. were among the most pathogenic root colonizers.

Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Outcome
most pathogenice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some Rhizoctonia solani strains and all Pythium spp. were the most pathogenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic management appeared to reduce soil sickness severity caused by root rot fungal pathogens.

Treatment
organic managemente0
Interactor
root rot fungal pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
soil sickness severitye0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
conventionalt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic management seems to reduce the soil sickness severity caused by root rot fungal pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“conventional and organic apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–126 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.