Paper · 2018 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Biological control of bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum: Insights into the ecology of antagonists and their complex interaction with the pathogen and the host plant rhizosphere microbiome

Elsayed, Tarek Sayed Ragab

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant diseases are among the most limiting factors in agricultural production all over the world, particularly when the causal agent is characterized as quarantine pathogen. One of the most devastating diseases is bacterial wilt of potato and tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) which is regarded as an epidemic soil-borne quarantine pathogen. The persistence and survival of Rs in soil for years and its ability to colonize a huge number of hosts and non-host crops poses a huge agricultural threat. In order to cope with such pathogen, investigations into the microbial diversity and suppressive potential in the soil and hizosphere of potential host plants are fundamental. In this context, we elucidated the effect of the soil types (DS, LL and AL) and the potato plant sphere (rhizosphere, endorhiza, endocaulosphere; tuber ecto- and endosphere) on the proportion and diversity of in vitro antagonists towards Rs. For this purpose, potato plants were grown under field conditions in three soil types that were stored at a unique experimental field site for more than ten years under the same weather conditions and cropping history. Screening equal numbers of dominant randomly picked colonies from each sphere for in vitro antagonistic activity towards Rs showed that in all spheres antagonists were detected among the dominant cultivable bacteria and that the highest proportion of antagonists was observed in the endophytic compartments. While several genotypes were detected only in one soil, other genotypes were isolated from two or three soils and in some cases with a preference to a particular soil. Based on these results, it is possible to conclude that both, plant sphere and soil types, affect the diversity and proportion of bacteria with in vitro antagonistic activity towards Rs. More antagonists with beneficial characteristics were isolated from plants grown in DS soils. However, to get more insights into the effect of the three soil types on the bacterial community associated with different plant spheres, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from total community DNA (TC-DNA) was employed to compare the bacterial communities associated with the five spheres of potato plants grown in the three soil types. Our results showed that, based on the soil types, bacterial communities associated with potato plant spheres differed significantly only in the rhizosphere and in the soil attached to tuber while the endophytic bacterial communities were more variable and less influenced by the soil type. Additionally, bacterial community composition significantly differed between different potato spheres of the plants that were grown in the same soil type indicating niche-specific bacterial communities. Furthermore, our results indicated that the effect of the plant sphere was more pronounced than that of the soil type. Most of the antagonists obtained in our first study (Chapter 2) were affiliated with the genus Pseudomonas which is often enriched in the rhizosphere due to their good rhizosphere competence as well as their ability to rapidly respond to root exudates and to produce multiple compounds with plant beneficial activity. We explored the influence of the three soil types on the abundance of Pseudomonas populations and genes related to beneficial traits in different potato plant spheres. Pseudomonas community composition associated with potato plant spheres was analyzed by DGGE of Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from TC-DNA and Pseudomonas-specific real-time PCR as influenced by the soil types and/or potato plant spheres. PCR-Southern blot hybridization was used to investigate the prevalence and distribution of Pseudomonas-specific genes encoding biological control and plant growth promoting related functions (phl, phz, prnD, hcnBC, pcbC, pqqE and gacA) in different plant spheres and soil types. The Pseudomonas community composition and abundance was significantly influenced by the soil type. The effect of soil types was only pronounced in the bulk soil and the soil tightly attached to the yield tubers. Both soil type and plant sphere had a very distinct effect on the distribution of Pseudomonas functional genes. Southern blot hybridization indicated the highest abundance of all tested genes was detected in the rhizosphere of potato plants grown in the LL soils, except for the 2,4-diacetyl phloroglucinol (phl). Our study indicated that Pseudomonas populations carrying the tested genes correlated with the type of soil and the enrichment of these genes, depended on the soil type-dependent rhizosphere effect. Finally, three greenhouse experiments with tomato plants were performed to evaluate the rhizocompetence of in vitro antagonists and their ability to control Rs. The population densities of Rs and antagonists were estimated by selective plating and in TC-DNA by means of real-time PCR and fliC gene PCR-Southern blot hybridization. Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants showed a pronounced delay or no disease symptoms and significantly decreased in Rs population compared to the uninoculated plants. Amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from TC-DNA revealed pronounced treatment-dependent shifts in bacterial communities of the tomato rhizosphere. Most important, the strong reduction of Rs in the presence of the antagonists was confirmed and dynamic taxa in response to Rs or the inoculants were identified. Confocal laser scanning microscopy uncovered colonization patterns of the AL2YTEN-142. Gfp-positive cells were detected in lateral roots, root hairs and epidermal cells and within xylem vessels. Both inoculants hold great promise to control Rs under field conditions. In conclusion, this thesis provides deeper insights into the influence of different soil types and plant microenvironments on total bacterial and Pseudomonas communities regarding their composition and functional diversity, paying particular attention to the diversity and abundance of antagonists of Ralstonia solanacearum. A selection of antagonists was tested for in planta biological control of Rs, and the complex interactions between antagonists, pathogen and indigenous rhizosphere microbiome were investigated. In future studies, the biological control of Rs and the plant growth promotion will be tested on potatoes under field conditions in Egypt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonists occurred in all potato plant spheres and were most frequent in endophytic compartments.

Organ / stage
endophytic compartmentse0
Interactor
antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
highest proportion of antagonistse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all spheres antagonists were detected among the dominant cultivable bacteria and that the highest proportion of antagonists was observed in the endophytic compartments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“bacterial wilt of potato and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist genotypes differed among soils.

Outcome
genotypes were detected only in one soile0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several genotypes were detected only in one soil, other genotypes were isolated from two or three soils and in some cases with a preference to a particular soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“bacterial wilt of potato and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More beneficial antagonists were isolated from potato plants grown in DS soils.

Interactor
antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonists with beneficial characteristicse0
Direction
Moree0
Setting
DS soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More antagonists with beneficial characteristics were isolated from plants grown in DS soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1903 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato plants were grown under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–993 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly differentiated potato bacterial communities in rhizosphere and tuber-attached soil.

Outcome
bacterial communitiese0
Setting
rhizosphere and in the soil attached to tubere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial communities associated with potato plant spheres differed significantly only in the rhizosphere and in the soil attached to tuber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2341–2480 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato endophytic bacterial communities were more variable and less influenced by soil type.

Outcome
endophytic bacterial communitiese0
Direction
less influencede0
Setting
soil typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the endophytic bacterial communities were more variable and less influenced by the soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2487–2579 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial community composition differed significantly among potato spheres within a soil type.

Organ / stage
potato spherese0
Outcome
bacterial community compositione0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial community composition significantly differed between different potato spheres of the plants that were grown in the same soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2595–2734 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant sphere had a more pronounced effect than soil type on potato bacterial communities.

Outcome
effect of the plant spheree0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
soil typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the plant sphere was more pronounced than that of the soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2824–2901 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most potato antagonists were affiliated with Pseudomonas.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
affiliated with the genus Pseudomonase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the antagonists obtained in our first study (Chapter 2) were affiliated with the genus Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2903–3009 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly influenced Pseudomonas composition and abundance in potato spheres.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Pseudomonas community composition and abundancee0
Setting
soil typee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Pseudomonas community composition and abundance was significantly influenced by the soil type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3930–4028 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil effects on Pseudomonas were pronounced in bulk and tuber-attached soils.

Outcome
effect of soil typese0
Setting
bulk soil and the soil tightly attached to the yield tuberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of soil types was only pronounced in the bulk soil and the soil tightly attached to the yield tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4029–4141 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type and plant sphere each affected distribution of Pseudomonas functional genes.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
distribution of Pseudomonas functional genese0
Setting
soil typee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both soil type and plant sphere had a very distinct effect on the distribution of Pseudomonas functional genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4142–4253 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested genes were most abundant in rhizosphere of potato grown in LL soil, apart from phl.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Outcome
abundance of all tested genese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
except for the 2,4-diacetyl phloroglucinol (phl)e0
Setting
LL soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest abundance of all tested genes was detected in the rhizosphere of potato plants grown in the LL soils, except for the 2,4-diacetyl phloroglucinol (phl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4296–4454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas gene carriage correlated with soil type.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Pseudomonas populations carrying the tested genese0
Setting
type of soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas populations carrying the tested genes correlated with the type of soil and the enrichment of these genes, depended on the soil type-dependent rhizosphere effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4481–4654 · show in text ↑
e1

“different potato plant spheres”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3357–3387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus vallismortis B63 delayed or prevented tomato disease symptoms.

Treatment
Bacillus vallismortis (B63)e0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus vallismortisBacillus vallismortise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
delaye0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants showed a pronounced delay or no disease symptoms and significantly decreased in Rs population compared to the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4986–5207 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments with tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4670–4711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas brassicacearum AL2YTEN-142 delayed or prevented tomato disease symptoms.

Treatment
Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculatede0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas brassicacearumPseudomonas brassicacearume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
delaye0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants showed a pronounced delay or no disease symptoms and significantly decreased in Rs population compared to the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4986–5207 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments with tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4670–4711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus vallismortis B63 significantly reduced Rs population in tomato.

Treatment
Bacillus vallismortis (B63)e0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus vallismortisBacillus vallismortise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Rs populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants showed a pronounced delay or no disease symptoms and significantly decreased in Rs population compared to the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4986–5207 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments with tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4670–4711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas brassicacearum AL2YTEN-142 significantly reduced Rs population in tomato.

Treatment
Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculatede0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas brassicacearumPseudomonas brassicacearume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Rs populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants showed a pronounced delay or no disease symptoms and significantly decreased in Rs population compared to the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4986–5207 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments with tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4670–4711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants produced treatment-dependent shifts in tomato rhizosphere communities.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Treatment
Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculatede1
Outcome
bacterial communitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pronounced treatment-dependent shifts in bacterial communities of the tomato rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5286–5375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus vallismortis (B63) and Pseudomonas brassicacearum (AL2YTEN-142)-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4986–5076 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL2YTEN-142 colonized lateral roots, root hairs, epidermal cells and xylem vessels.

Organ / stage
lateral roots, root hairs and epidermal cells and within xylem vesselse0
Interactor
AL2YTEN-142e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Gfp-positive cells were detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gfp-positive cells were detected in lateral roots, root hairs and epidermal cells and within xylem vessels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5625–5732 · show in text ↑
e1

“colonization patterns of the AL2YTEN-142”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5583–5623 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4698–4711 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Both inoculants were promising for field control of Rs.

Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Outcome
control Rs under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both inoculants hold great promise to control Rs under field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5733–5805 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments with tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4670–4711 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas brassicacearum · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.