Paper · 2019 · Időjárás

Modeling the impact of climate change on yield, water requirements, and water use efficiency of maize and soybean grown under moderate continental climate in the Pannonian lowland

Milena Jancic Tovjanin; Vladimir Djurdjevic; Borivoj Pejic; et al.

6
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract In Central and Eastern Europe, climate changes have been predicted These changes are expected to have a great impact on field crops during the spring-summer growing season. The aim of this paper is to estimate the impact of climate change on the main field crops (maize and soybean) in the Republic of Serbia. The AquaCrop model was used as a tool to quantify climate change impact on yield and net irrigation using results from the ECHAM climate model (SRES A2 scenario for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods) and data from two experimental fields located in the southern part of the Pannonian lowland. The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed an increase in maize (1 and 1.3 t/ha) and soybean (1.9 and 2.8 t/ha) yields and a very significant increase in the net irrigation of 151.4 and 183.1 mm in maize production and 179.3 and 227.3 mm in soybean production under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period. Additionally, irrigation water use efficiency was calculated to estimate the importance of irrigation, because crop production is usually conducted under rainfed conditions. It was concluded that maize and soybean production should benefit from climate changes but with higher water quantities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected soybean yield increased by 1.9 and 2.8 t/ha in 2041-2070.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee3
Value
1.9 and 2.8 t/hae0
Qualifier
2041-2070e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (1.9 and 2.8 t/ha) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“an increase in maize (1 and 1.3 t/ha) and soybean (1.9 and 2.8 t/ha) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected soybean yield increased by 2.8 t/ha in 2071-2100.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee3
Value
2.8 t/hae0
Qualifier
2071-2100e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean (1.9 and 2.8 t/ha) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“an increase in maize (1 and 1.3 t/ha) and soybean (1.9 and 2.8 t/ha) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

maize net irrigation increased by 151.4 and 183.1 mm in 2041-2070.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
net irrigatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
151.4 and 183.1 mme0
Qualifier
2041-2070e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the net irrigation of 151.4 and 183.1 mm in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

maize net irrigation increased by 183.1 mm in 2071-2100.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
net irrigatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
183.1 mme0
Qualifier
2071-2100e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the net irrigation of 151.4 and 183.1 mm in maize production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

soybean net irrigation increased by 179.3 and 227.3 mm in 2041-2070.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
net irrigatione3
Direction
increasee3
Value
179.3 and 227.3 mme0
Qualifier
2041-2070e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“179.3 and 227.3 mm in soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“a very significant increase in the net irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

soybean net irrigation increased by 227.3 mm in 2071-2100.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
climate change conditionse2
Outcome
net irrigatione3
Direction
increasee3
Value
227.3 mme0
Qualifier
2071-2100e1
Comparator
1961-1990 periode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“179.3 and 227.3 mm in soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“The analyzed results for the 2041-2070 and 2071-2100 periods showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“under climate change conditions compared to the 1961-1990 period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–963 · show in text ↑
e3

“a very significant increase in the net irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–811 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

73 papers: 36 positive, 37 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.