Paper · 2019 · BMC Plant Biology

Differences in the photosynthetic and physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to different levels of grazing intensity

Min Liu; Jirui Gong; Bo Yang; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Grazing is an important land use in northern China. In general, different grazing intensities had a different impact on the morphological and physiological traits of plants, and especially their photosynthetic capacity. We investigated the responses of Leymus chinensis to light, medium, and heavy grazing intensities in comparison with a grazing exclusion control. RESULTS: With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity. The low chlorophyll and carotenoid contents constrained light energy transformation and dissipation, and Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency. In addition, the damaged photosynthetic apparatus accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS). With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching, whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest. Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents. Plants decreased the risk caused by ROS through increased energy dissipation. With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation. More energy was allocated to photosynthetic electron transport. Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure, adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis, and an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the plants adopted different strategies by adjusting their metabolism and growth in response to their changing environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light grazing decreased photosynthetic capacity.

Taxon
L. chinensisLeymus chinensise0
Treatment
light grazinge0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light grazing reduced Rubisco activity.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
light grazinge1
Gene
Rubiscoe0
Outcome
Rubisco activitye0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Rubisco activity was also low, restricting the carboxylation efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“With light grazing, L. chinensis showed decreased photosynthetic capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium grazing produced high carotene content and non-photochemical quenching.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
medium grazinge0
Outcome
carotene content and high non-photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic electron transport was lowest with medium grazing.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
medium grazinge1
Outcome
photosynthetic electron transporte0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“whereas photosynthetic electron transport was lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“With medium grazing, more energy was used for thermal dissipation, with high carotene content and high non-photochemical quenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–863 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf carbon contents.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf C contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
decreased photosynthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly decreased photosynthesis decreased leaf C contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing increased compensatory photosynthesis.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
high grazing intensitye1
Outcome
compensatory photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“adjustment of internal mechanisms increased compensatory photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“With high grazing intensity, plants changed their strategy to improve survival through photosynthetic compensation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing increased tiller number.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
heavy grazinge1
Outcome
tiller numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an increased tiller number facilitated regrowth after grazing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though heavy grazing damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1302 · show in text ↑

grazing · physiology: photosynthesis · Leymus chinensisResults differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grazing · yield · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.