Paper · 2019 · Functional Plant Biology

Harnessing leaf photosynthetic traits and antioxidant defence for multiple stress tolerance in three premium indigenous rice landraces of Jeypore tract of Odisha, India

Debabrata Panda; Biswajeet Mohanty; Prafulla K. Behera; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to compare the effects of different abiotic stresses (drought, salinity and submergence) on growth, photosynthesis and PSII activity along with antioxidant defence of three premium rice landraces, namely Kalajeera, Machhakanta and Haladichudi from Jeypore tract of Odisha, India to evaluate their performance under multiple stresses and possibility of using in the pre-breeding programs. Results showed that drought, salinity and submergence significantly reduced plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE), PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll index, and the highest effect was observed in susceptible check variety (IR64). In addition, the indigenous rice lines showed better stomatal traits such as stomatal density (SD), stomatal size (SS) and stomatal number per leaf area (S/LA). Notably, higher activities of antioxidative enzymes and proline accumulation was observed in studied indigenous rice landraces and were found comparable with the drought and salinity tolerant (N22) and submergence tolerant (FR13A) check varieties. Based on our findings it was revealed that these landraces can be expected to possess an adequate level of tolerance to drought, salinity and submergence and showed adaptive fitness to multiple stresses during seedling stage. These landraces can be considered as potential donor for future rice pre-breeding program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought, salinity and submergence significantly reduced plant growth.

Treatment
drought, salinity and submergencee0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought, salinity and submergence significantly reduced plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE), PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three stresses significantly reduced leaf photosynthesis, water use and carboxylation efficiency.

Treatment
drought, salinity and submergencee0
Outcome
leaf photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought, salinity and submergence significantly reduced plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE), PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three stresses significantly reduced PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll index.

Treatment
drought, salinity and submergencee0
Outcome
PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought, salinity and submergence significantly reduced plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, water use efficiency (WUE), carboxylation efficiency (CE), PSII activity and SPAD chlorophyll index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The susceptible check IR64 showed the greatest stress effect.

Material
IR64e0
Outcome
highest effecte0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest effect was observed in susceptible check variety (IR64)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous rice lines had better stomatal density, size and number per leaf area.

Material
indigenous rice linese0
Outcome
stomatal density (SD), stomatal size (SS) and stomatal number per leaf area (S/LA)e0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rice lines showed better stomatal traits such as stomatal density (SD), stomatal size (SS) and stomatal number per leaf area (S/LA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied landraces had higher antioxidative enzyme activity and proline accumulation.

Material
indigenous rice landracese0
Outcome
activities of antioxidative enzymes and proline accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher activities of antioxidative enzymes and proline accumulation was observed in studied indigenous rice landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landrace antioxidant responses were comparable with tolerant check varieties.

Outcome
comparablee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
N22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were found comparable with the drought and salinity tolerant (N22) and submergence tolerant (FR13A) check varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors considered the landraces potential donors for rice pre-breeding.

Material
These landracese0
Outcome
potential donor for future rice pre-breeding programe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These landraces can be considered as potential donor for future rice pre-breeding program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1433 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

69 papers: 6 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 8 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 6 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

92 papers: 30 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 18 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.