Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Conservation Agriculture Improves Long-term Yield and Soil Quality in Irrigated Maize-oats Rotation

Simon Fonteyne; Miguel-Angel Martinez Gamiño; Abel Saldivia Tejeda; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conservation agriculture, characterized by minimal tillage, permanent soil cover and crop diversification, has been widely adapted under rainfed conditions, but adoption under irrigated conditions is limited. An experiment initiated in 1997 to evaluate the level of tillage and the amount of soil cover needed for conservation agriculture to work under irrigated conditions in the highlands of San Luis Potosí, Mexico. The trial encompassed seven treatments: conventional tillage, two types of reduced tillage and permanent raised beds (PB), which are untilled, with four levels of soil cover in an irrigated rotation with maize (Zea mays L.) in the summer and fodder oats (Avena sativa L.) in the winter. Maize and oats yielded significantly more under PB than with tillage. Maize yielded on average 1.2 Mg ha−1 more in PB with the hybrid used from 1997 to 2008 and 3.9 Mg ha−1 more with the hybrid used from 2012 to 2017. Permanent raised beds generated on average $18,424 MXN ha−1 more profit than the tilled treatments and increased soil organic carbon on average 63% at 0 to 5 cm depth and 32% at 5 to 30 cm depth. The trial shows that conservation agriculture, with PB and little residue cover, is a viable and sustainable option in similar production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yielded significantly more under permanent raised beds (PB) than with tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PBe0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize and oats yielded significantly more under PB than with tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder oats yielded significantly more under permanent raised beds (PB) than with tillage.

Treatment
PBe0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize and oats yielded significantly more under PB than with tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yielded on average 1.2 Mg ha-1 more in permanent raised beds with the hybrid used from 1997 to 2008.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PBe0
Outcome
Maize yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
1.2 Mg ha−1e0
Qualifier
hybrid used from 1997 to 2008e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yielded on average 1.2 Mg ha−1 more in PB with the hybrid used from 1997 to 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yielded on average 3.9 Mg ha-1 more in permanent raised beds with the hybrid used from 2012 to 2017.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PBe0
Outcome
Maize yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Value
3.9 Mg ha−1e0
Qualifier
hybrid used from 2012 to 2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yielded on average 1.2 Mg ha−1 more in PB with the hybrid used from 1997 to 2008 and 3.9 Mg ha−1 more with the hybrid used from 2012 to 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent raised beds generated on average $18,424 MXN ha-1 more profit than the tilled treatments.

Treatment
Permanent raised bedse0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
moree0
Value
$18,424 MXN ha−1e0
Comparator
tilled treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Permanent raised beds generated on average $18,424 MXN ha−1 more profit than the tilled treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent raised beds increased soil organic carbon on average by 63% at 0 to 5 cm depth.

Treatment
Permanent raised bedse0
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
increasede1
Value
63%e1
Qualifier
0 to 5 cm depthe1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Permanent raised beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased soil organic carbon on average 63% at 0 to 5 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent raised beds increased soil organic carbon on average by 32% at 5 to 30 cm depth.

Treatment
Permanent raised bedse0
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
increasede1
Value
32%e1
Qualifier
5 to 30 cm depthe1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Permanent raised beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased soil organic carbon on average 63% at 0 to 5 cm depth and 32% at 5 to 30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that conservation agriculture with permanent raised beds and little residue cover is a viable and sustainable option in similar production systems.

Treatment
PBe0
Outcome
viable and sustainable optione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“conservation agriculture, with PB and little residue cover, is a viable and sustainable option in similar production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1265 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.