Abstract
The compensation for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) under simulated herbivory stress by clipping was examined in a semi-arid region of Gansu province in 1996. The results showed that clipping at seedling stage reduced spring wheat growth under two irrigation conditions. The yield of spring wheat generally under-compensated the clipping effect. Heavy clipping (cutting all leaves above the ground, T0, T1) resulted in a more serious reduction in yield, compared with light clipping cutting half of the leaves, H0, H1). The yields of all treatments were lower than controls(CK0, CK1), i.e., CK0 > H0 > T0 > CK1 > H1 > T1. Irrigation for once right after clipping increased wheat growth and its compensatory ability, although they were still under-compensation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Seedling clipping reduced spring wheat growth under both irrigation conditions.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- clipping at seedling stagee0
- Outcome
- spring wheat growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“clipping at seedling stage reduced spring wheat growth under two irrigation conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat yield generally undercompensated after clipping.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- clippinge0
- Outcome
- yield of spring wheate0
- Direction
- under-compensatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of spring wheat generally under-compensated the clipping effect”
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy clipping reduced yield more than light clipping.
- Treatment
- Heavy clipping (cutting all leaves above the ground, T0, T1)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- more serious reductione0
- Comparator
- light clipping cutting half of the leaves, H0, H1e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Heavy clipping (cutting all leaves above the ground, T0, T1) resulted in a more serious reduction in yield, compared with light clipping cutting half of the leaves, H0, H1)”
Claim · model-written summary
All clipping treatment yields were below controls, ranked CK0 > H0 > T0 > CK1 > H1 > T1.
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- CK0 > H0 > T0 > CK1 > H1 > T1e0
- Comparator
- controls(CK0, CK1)e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The yields of all treatments were lower than controls(CK0, CK1), i.e., CK0 > H0 > T0 > CK1 > H1 > T1”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation immediately after clipping increased wheat growth.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Irrigation for once right after clippinge0
- Outcome
- wheat growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation for once right after clipping increased wheat growth and its compensatory ability, although they were still under-compensation”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation immediately after clipping increased compensatory ability, although compensation remained incomplete.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Irrigation for once right after clippinge0
- Outcome
- compensatory abilitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- still under-compensatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation for once right after clipping increased wheat growth and its compensatory ability, although they were still under-compensation”
The same questions in other papers
mechanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →mechanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
238 papers more in this group
See all 242 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.