Abstract
A field experiment was carried out on a newly reclaimed land at the Agricultural Experimental Desert Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, in Wady El-Natroon district, ElBeheira Governorate, Egypt, cultivated with tomato plants (Supper Strain B F1 cultivar) and irrigated with saline water (2500 ppm) during the summer growing seasons of 2013 and 2014 to study the potential benefit of some repellant salinity agents (Dinamic, Uni-sal and humic acid) for alleviating adverse effect of saline irrigation water on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato. This experiment was designed in completely randomized block design with three replications. Seven soil treatments, namely, Dinamic, Uni-sal, humic acid and all possible combinations among them were compared with control (untreated soil). Each compound was used four times (at the transplanting and 15, 30 and 45 days after transplanting) through drip irrigation system at rate of 4 liter/feddan. The effects of these repellant salinity agents on plant length, number of branches, fresh, dry of shoot weight, nutrients content in leaves, total yield, fruit firmness, TSS, titratable acidity and vitamin C in fruits were studied. Results revealed that, all repellant salinity agents were effective in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity on vegetative growth and yield in compared to the control treatment. Using combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acid gave the highest value of vegetative growth, nutritional content, yield and fruit characters compared to other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Repellant salinity agents alleviated salinity effects on tomato vegetative growth compared with untreated soil.
- Taxon
- tomato plants
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Material
- Supper Strain B F1 cultivare1
- Treatment
- all repellant salinity agentse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- alleviatinge0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all repellant salinity agents were effective in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity on vegetative growth and yield in compared to the control treatment.”
e1“cultivated with tomato plants (Supper Strain B F1 cultivar) and irrigated with saline water (2500 ppm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Repellant salinity agents alleviated salinity effects on tomato yield compared with untreated soil.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- all repellant salinity agentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- alleviatinge0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all repellant salinity agents were effective in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity on vegetative growth and yield in compared to the control treatment.”
e1“cultivated with tomato plants (Supper Strain B F1 cultivar) and irrigated with saline water (2500 ppm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinamic and Uni-sal together gave the highest vegetative growth compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acide0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acid gave the highest value of vegetative growth, nutritional content, yield and fruit characters compared to other treatments.”
t0“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinamic and Uni-sal together gave the highest nutritional content compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acide0
- Outcome
- nutritional contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acid gave the highest value of vegetative growth, nutritional content, yield and fruit characters compared to other treatments.”
t0“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinamic and Uni-sal together gave the highest yield compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acide0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acid gave the highest value of vegetative growth, nutritional content, yield and fruit characters compared to other treatments.”
t0“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinamic and Uni-sal together gave the highest fruit characters compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acide0
- Outcome
- fruit characterse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using combination between Dinamic and Uni-sal with or without humic acid gave the highest value of vegetative growth, nutritional content, yield and fruit characters compared to other treatments.”
t0“tomato plants”
The same questions in other papers
other · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
171 papers more in this group
See all 175 papers →salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 261 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
296 papers more in this group
See all 300 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.