Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Interactive Effects of Salicylic Acid and Silicon on Growth, Development and Cadmium Accumulation in Tuber of Potato Plants under Cadmium Stress

Mohammad Javad Arvin; Kh. Moslemi; M. Sarchashmepur; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil accumulation with toxic metals and their transmition into agricultural products as a world problem is ever expanding. Cadmium (Cd) content of soil has increased due to luxury consumption of phosphorous fertilizers application which enters human food chain. In present study which was conducted in college of agriculture, Kerman University in 2010, the effects of chemical treatments namely salicylic (SA) at 0.1mM, silicon (Si) at 5 mM and SA+Si (0.1 mM and 5 mM) was studied on growth and development and cadmium accumulation in potato tubers grown under cadmium stress (0 and 12 mg/kg soil) in a pot experiment, using a factorial experiment with three replications. Compared with control treatment (No Cd), Cd decreased relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic and plant growth parameters. It also increased leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) and Cd accumulation in tubers. All chemical treatments improved plant performance under Cd stress and non-stress conditions and the effect of SA+Si was more pronounced for most recorded parameters. However, under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%) , tuber fresh weight (112%), chlorophylls (50%) and decreased MDA (50%) and Cd accumulation in tubers (85%), relative to corresponding control and therefore, this treatment (SA+Si) can be commercially used to improve plant performance and reduce tuber Cd contents under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium decreased relative water content, photosynthetic parameters and growth in potato versus no cadmium.

Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic and plant growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatment (No Cd)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control treatment (No Cd), Cd decreased relative water content (RWC), photosynthetic and plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased leaf MDA and tuber Cd accumulation.

Treatment
Cde1
Outcome
leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) and Cd accumulation in tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (No Cd)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) and Cd accumulation in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with control treatment (No Cd), Cd decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatments improved potato performance with and without cadmium, especially SA+Si.

Treatment
SA+Sie0
Outcome
plant performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under Cd stress and non-stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All chemical treatments improved plant performance under Cd stress and non-stress conditions and the effect of SA+Si was more pronounced for most recorded parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Cd stress SA+Si increased tuber number by 81%.

Treatment
combination of SA+Sie0
Outcome
tuber numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
81%e0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0
Comparator
corresponding controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1119 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to corresponding control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Cd stress SA+Si increased tuber fresh weight by 112%.

Treatment
combination of SA+Sie0
Outcome
tuber fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
112%e0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0
Comparator
corresponding controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%) , tuber fresh weight (112%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to corresponding control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Cd stress SA+Si increased chlorophylls by 50%.

Treatment
combination of SA+Sie0
Outcome
chlorophyllse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0
Comparator
corresponding controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%) , tuber fresh weight (112%), chlorophylls (50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to corresponding control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Cd stress SA+Si decreased MDA by 50%.

Treatment
combination of SA+Sie0
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0
Comparator
corresponding controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%) , tuber fresh weight (112%), chlorophylls (50%) and decreased MDA (50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to corresponding control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Cd stress SA+Si decreased tuber Cd accumulation by 85%.

Treatment
combination of SA+Sie0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in tuberse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
85%e0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0
Comparator
corresponding controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under Cd stress, combination of SA+Si increased tuber number (81%) , tuber fresh weight (112%), chlorophylls (50%) and decreased MDA (50%) and Cd accumulation in tubers (85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to corresponding control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose commercial use of SA+Si to improve performance and reduce tuber Cd in field conditions.

Treatment
SA+Sie0
Outcome
improve plant performance and reduce tuber Cd contentse0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment (SA+Si) can be commercially used to improve plant performance and reduce tuber Cd contents under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: oxidative · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.