Paper · 2019 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Integrated soil-cotton management system enhances nitrogen use efficiency under different soil fertility levels

Xinyue Zhang; Hongkun Yang; Rizwan Zahoor; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An integrated soil-cotton management system integrated with optimal management practices is projected to replace the conventional management system for enhancing nitrogen use efficiency. Field experiment was conducted in the more and less fertile soil with two treatments. Results showed that compared with conventional management system, integrated soil-cotton management system increased 9.5–21.2% soil-available nitrogen during the middle and later growth stages, in addition, improved average and maximum accumulation rate of nitrogen by 30.4–36.2% and 39.9–45.1%, and postponed the start time of the fast nitrogen accumulation phase by 3–6d, resulting in 32.5–38.3% higher final nitrogen accumulation. Furthermore, the increased nitrogen accumulation improved leaf area index, leaf area duration and boll number, finally enhanced agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiency. We suggest the nitrogen-based fertilizer of integrated soil-cotton management system could be omitted completely in the more fertile soil to enhance physiological nitrogen use efficiency ultimately by optimizing leaf area index. In addition, the decrement of nitrogen use efficiency was diminished under integrated soil-cotton management system. These results demonstrate ISMS might be a more profitable pattern for nitrogen use efficiency of cotton, especially to meet the challenge of soil degradation in future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management increased soil available nitrogen 9.5–21.2% in middle and later growth stages.

Treatment
integrated soil-cotton management systeme0
Outcome
soil-available nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.5–21.2%e0
Comparator
conventional management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with conventional management system, integrated soil-cotton management system increased 9.5–21.2% soil-available nitrogen during the middle and later growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management improved average nitrogen accumulation rate 30.4–36.2%.

Treatment
Integrated soil-cotton management systemt0
Outcome
accumulation rate of nitrogene0
Direction
improvede0
Value
30.4–36.2%e0
Comparator
conventional management systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved average and maximum accumulation rate of nitrogen by 30.4–36.2% and 39.9–45.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated soil-cotton management system enhances nitrogen use efficiency under different soil fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional management system, integrated soil-cotton management system increased 9.5–21.2% soil-available nitrogen during the middle and later growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management improved maximum nitrogen accumulation rate 39.9–45.1%.

Treatment
Integrated soil-cotton management systemt0
Outcome
maximum accumulation rate of nitrogene0
Direction
improvede0
Value
39.9–45.1%e0
Comparator
conventional management systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved average and maximum accumulation rate of nitrogen by 30.4–36.2% and 39.9–45.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated soil-cotton management system enhances nitrogen use efficiency under different soil fertility levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with conventional management system, integrated soil-cotton management system increased 9.5–21.2% soil-available nitrogen during the middle and later growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management postponed onset of rapid nitrogen accumulation by 3–6 days.

Treatment
Integrated soil-cotton management systemt0
Outcome
start time of the fast nitrogen accumulation phasee0
Direction
postponede0
Value
3–6de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postponed the start time of the fast nitrogen accumulation phase by 3–6d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated soil-cotton management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management raised final nitrogen accumulation 32.5–38.3%.

Treatment
Integrated soil-cotton management systemt0
Outcome
final nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.5–38.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in 32.5–38.3% higher final nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated soil-cotton management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen accumulation improved leaf area index, leaf area duration, and boll number.

Outcome
leaf area index, leaf area duration and boll numbere0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased nitrogen accumulation improved leaf area index, leaf area duration and boll number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen accumulation enhanced agronomic and recovery nitrogen use efficiency.

Outcome
agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest omitting nitrogen fertilizer on more fertile soil under integrated management.

Outcome
nitrogen-based fertilizer of integrated soil-cotton management system could be omitted completelye0
Setting
more fertile soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen-based fertilizer of integrated soil-cotton management system could be omitted completely in the more fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management diminished the decline in nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
integrated soil-cotton management systeme0
Outcome
decrement of nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
diminishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decrement of nitrogen use efficiency was diminished under integrated soil-cotton management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.