Paper · 2017

Effect of bio-fertilizers with graded doses of NPK on Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) infected by Meloidogyne incognita

M K Patra; B K Dash; J K Mahalik

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A replicated pot culture study was conducted on the effect of biofertilizers like Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Phosphorus Solubilising Bacteria (PSB) with graded doses of NPK on tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) infected by Meloidogyne incognita. The results revealed that all other treatments barring the untreated check significantly increased the plant growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode multiplication. However, application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check. The application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum +Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha could be one of the management option of Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments except the untreated check significantly increased tomato growth parameters.

Treatment
all other treatments barring the untreated checke0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that all other treatments barring the untreated check significantly increased the plant growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments except the untreated check significantly reduced root knot nematode multiplication on tomato.

Treatment
all other treatments barring the untreated checke0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
root knot nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that all other treatments barring the untreated check significantly increased the plant growth parameters and reduced root knot nematode multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced N-P-K plus Azospirillum, Azotobacter and PSB increased tomato height by 80.6% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
80.6%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment increased tomato shoot fresh weight by 66.3% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
66.3%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment increased tomato root fresh weight by 77.3% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
77.3%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment increased tomato shoot dry weight by 66.3% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
66.3%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment increased tomato root dry weight by 64.2% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
64.2%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment increased tomato root volume by 76.7% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
76.7%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment decreased tomato root galls by 75.8% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
75.8%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced NPK and biofertilizer treatment decreased final root knot nematode population in soil and root by 74.8% over the untreated check.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
final root knot nematode population in soil and roote0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
74.8%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum + Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha performed the best by increasing the plant height (80.6%), shoot fresh weight (66.3%), root fresh weight (77.3%), shoot dry weight (66.3%), root dry weight (64.2%), root volume (76.7%) with the corresponding decrease in root galls (75.8%) and final root knot nematode population in soil and root (74.8%) over untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (cv. Pusa ruby) infected by Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose balanced NPK plus biofertilizers as a management option for Meloidogyne incognita in tomato.

Treatment
balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum +Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
management option of Meloidogyne incognitae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application balanced N-P-K @ 125-50-100 kg/ha and bio fertilizers (Azospirillum +Azotobacter + PSB) @ 6 kg/ha could be one of the management option of Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1051 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 44 positive, 26 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 64 positive, 12 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

phosphorus · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.