Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Botany

PAMP-INDUCED SECRETED PEPTIDE 3 (PIP3) modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana

Javad Najafi; Tore Brembu; Ane Kjersti Vie; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Small post-translationally modified peptides are important signalling components of plant defence responses against phytopathogens, acting as both positive and negative modulators. PAMP-INDUCED SECRETED PEPTIDE (PIP) 1 and 2 have been shown to amplify plant immunity. Here we investigate the role of the related peptide PIP3 in the regulation of immune response in Arabidopsis. Treatment with synthetic PIP peptides led to similar transcriptome reprogramming, indicating an effect on innate immunity-related processes and phytohormones, including jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis and signalling. PIP3 overexpressing (OX) plants showed enhanced growth inhibition in response to flg22 exposure. In addition, flg22-induced production of reactive oxygen species and callose deposition was significantly reduced in PIP3-OX plants. Interestingly, PIP3-OX plants showed increased susceptibility toward both Botrytis cinerea and the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Expression of both JA and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis and signalling genes was more induced during B. cinerea infection in PIP3-OX plants compared with wild-type plants. Promoter and ChIP-seq analyses indicated that the transcription factors WRKY18, WRKY33, and WRKY40 cooperatively act as repressors for PIP3. The results point to a fine-tuning role for PIP3 in modulation of immunity through the regulation of SA and JA biosynthesis and signalling pathways in Arabidopsis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic PIP peptide treatment led to similar transcriptome reprogramming in Arabidopsis.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Treatment
synthetic PIP peptidese1
Outcome
transcriptome reprogramminge1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment with synthetic PIP peptides led to similar transcriptome reprogramming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PIP3 overexpressing plants showed enhanced growth inhibition in response to flg22 exposure.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Material
PIP3 overexpressing (OX) plantse3
Treatment
flg22 exposuree3
Outcome
growth inhibitione3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“PIP3 overexpressing (OX) plants showed enhanced growth inhibition in response to flg22 exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

flg22-induced production of reactive oxygen species and callose deposition was significantly reduced in PIP3-OX plants.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Material
PIP3-OX plantse4
Treatment
flg22e4
Outcome
production of reactive oxygen species and callose depositione4
Direction
significantly reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“flg22-induced production of reactive oxygen species and callose deposition was significantly reduced in PIP3-OX plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–823 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PIP3-OX plants were more susceptible to Botrytis cinerea.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Material
PIP3-OX plantse5
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae5pathogen
Outcome
susceptibilitye5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e5

“PIP3-OX plants showed increased susceptibility toward both Botrytis cinerea and the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–964 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PIP3-OX plants were more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Material
PIP3-OX plantse5
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringaePseudomonas syringaee5pathogen
Outcome
susceptibilitye5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e5

“PIP3-OX plants showed increased susceptibility toward both Botrytis cinerea and the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA and SA biosynthesis and signalling genes were more induced during B. cinerea infection in PIP3-OX plants than in wild-type plants.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Material
PIP3-OX plantse6
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione6
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae6pathogen
Gene
JA and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis and signalling genese6
Outcome
Expressione6
Direction
more inducede6
Comparator
wild-type plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e6

“Expression of both JA and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis and signalling genes was more induced during B. cinerea infection in PIP3-OX plants compared with wild-type plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1139 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WRKY18, WRKY33 and WRKY40 act as repressors of PIP3.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Gene
WRKY18, WRKY33, and WRKY40e7
Outcome
act as repressors for PIP3e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e7

“Promoter and ChIP-seq analyses indicated that the transcription factors WRKY18, WRKY33, and WRKY40 cooperatively act as repressors for PIP3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1280 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PIP3 fine-tunes immunity through regulation of SA and JA biosynthesis and signalling in Arabidopsis.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianat0
Outcome
modulation of immunitye2
Qualifier
regulation of SA and JA biosynthesis and signalling pathwayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modulates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results point to a fine-tuning role for PIP3 in modulation of immunity through the regulation of SA and JA biosynthesis and signalling pathways in Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1444 · show in text ↑

resistance inducer · physiology: oxidative · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.