Paper · 2019 · Annals of Botany

Decomposition analysis on soybean productivity increase under elevated CO2 using 3-D canopy model reveals synergestic effects of CO2 and light in photosynthesis

Qingfeng Song; Venkatraman Srinivasan; Steve P Long; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Understanding how climate change influences crop productivity helps in identifying new options to increase crop productivity. Soybean is the most important dicotyledonous seed crop in terms of planting area. Although the impacts of elevated atmospheric [CO2] on soybean physiology, growth and biomass accumulation have been studied extensively, the contribution of different factors to changes in season-long whole crop photosynthetic CO2 uptake [gross primary productivity (GPP)] under elevated [CO2] have not been fully quantified. METHODS: A 3-D canopy model combining canopy 3-D architecture, ray tracing and leaf photosynthesis was built to: (1) study the impacts of elevated [CO2] on soybean GPP across a whole growing season; (2) dissect the contribution of different factors to changes in GPP; and (3) determine the extent, if any, of synergism between [CO2] and light on changes in GPP. The model was parameterized from measurements of leaf physiology and canopy architectural parameters at the soybean Free Air CO2 Enrichment (SoyFACE) facility in Champaign, Illinois. KEY RESULTS: Using this model, we showed that both a CO2 fertilization effect and changes in canopy architecture contributed to the large increase in GPP while acclimation in photosynthetic physiological parameters to elevated [CO2] and altered leaf temperature played only a minor role in the changes in GPP. Furthermore, at early developmental stages, elevated [CO2] increased leaf area index which led to increased canopy light absorption and canopy photosynthesis. At later developmental stages, on days with high ambient light levels, the proportion of leaves in a canopy limited by Rubisco carboxylation increased from 12.2 % to 35.6 %, which led to a greater enhancement of elevated [CO2] to GPP. CONCLUSIONS: This study develops a new method to dissect the contribution of different factors to responses of crops under climate change. We showed that there is a synergestic effect of CO2 and light on crop growth under elevated CO2 conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization contributed to the large modeled GPP increase.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CO2 fertilization effecte0
Outcome
increase in GPPe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both a CO2 fertilization effect and changes in canopy architecture contributed to the large increase in GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy architectural changes contributed to the large modeled GPP increase.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
increase in GPPe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
changes in canopy architecturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in canopy architecture contributed to the large increase in GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic acclimation played only a minor role in modeled GPP changes.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
minor role in the changes in GPPe0
Qualifier
acclimation in photosynthetic physiological parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acclimation in photosynthetic physiological parameters to elevated [CO2] and altered leaf temperature played only a minor role in the changes in GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Altered leaf temperature played only a minor role in modeled GPP changes.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
minor role in the changes in GPPe0
Qualifier
altered leaf temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altered leaf temperature played only a minor role in the changes in GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased early-stage leaf area index.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
early developmental stagese0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at early developmental stages, elevated [CO2] increased leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher leaf area index increased canopy light absorption.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
increased canopy light absorptione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increased leaf area indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf area index which led to increased canopy light absorption and canopy photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Higher leaf area index increased canopy photosynthesis.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
canopy photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increased leaf area indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf area index which led to increased canopy light absorption and canopy photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

On high-light days later in development, Rubisco-limited leaves rose from 12.2% to 35.6%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
proportion of leaves in a canopy limited by Rubisco carboxylatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.2 % to 35.6 %e0
Qualifier
days with high ambient light levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on days with high ambient light levels, the proportion of leaves in a canopy limited by Rubisco carboxylation increased from 12.2 % to 35.6 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1741 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increased Rubisco limitation yielded greater elevated-CO2 enhancement of GPP.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
enhancement of elevated [CO2] to GPPe0
Qualifier
greater enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which led to a greater enhancement of elevated [CO2] to GPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model identified a synergistic effect of CO2 and light on crop growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Qualifier
synergestic effect of CO2 and lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a synergestic effect of CO2 and light on crop growth under elevated CO2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2049 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 83 positive, 18 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.