Paper · 2019 · Key engineering materials

Post-Harvest Shelf Life Extension of Mango Using Chitosan and Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Coatings

Samanya Phuangto; Onyupha Chandee; Tipaporn Subsomboon; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biopolymer-based coatings or films can be used as an alternative to the replacement of conventional packaging, to preserve fresh fruit quality and extend their shelf life. This study aimed to prepare and characterize biopolymeric coating films based on chitosan and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Film coating of biopolymers was further applied on mango fruits, and the efficacy of coating materials in post-harvest shelf life and maintaining quality parameters of mango were then determined. The coating method of the films over mango was prepared using a dipping technique. Fruit weight loss, colors and content of total soluble solids were evaluated to assess fruit quality during 14 days at 25 °C of storage. Results indicated that films formulated with CMC showed significantly higher water solubility and water vapor transmission rate. Notably, coating improved the quality of mango during storage. Between the coating types, CMC was found to be significantly more effective in maintaining fruit fresh weight during the storage period. The fruit treated with CMC lowered the change in color and had higher soluble solids content than that of chitosan coating on the fourteenth day of storage. These results demonstrate that CMC-based coating could be utilized for the extension of the fruit commercialization period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC films had significantly higher water solubility and water vapor transmission.

Material
CMCe0
Outcome
water solubility and water vapor transmission ratee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“films formulated with CMC showed significantly higher water solubility and water vapor transmission rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating improved mango quality during storage.

Treatment
coatinge0
Outcome
quality of mangoe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coating improved the quality of mango during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC maintained mango fresh weight more effectively than chitosan coating.

Treatment
CMCe0
Outcome
fruit fresh weighte0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
chitosan coatinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CMC was found to be significantly more effective in maintaining fruit fresh weight during the storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“Between the coating types, CMC was found to be significantly more effective in maintaining fruit fresh weight during the storage period. The fruit treated with CMC lowered the change in color and had higher soluble solids content than that of chitosan coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC reduced fruit color change relative to chitosan coating on storage day 14.

Treatment
CMCe0
Outcome
change in colore0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
on the fourteenth day of storagee0
Comparator
chitosan coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit treated with CMC lowered the change in color and had higher soluble solids content than that of chitosan coating on the fourteenth day of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coated fruit had higher soluble solids than chitosan coated fruit on day 14.

Treatment
CMCe0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
on the fourteenth day of storagee0
Comparator
chitosan coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit treated with CMC lowered the change in color and had higher soluble solids content than that of chitosan coating on the fourteenth day of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

carboxymethylcellulose · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carboxymethylcellulose · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.