Paper · 1990 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Ripening of Mangos Following Low-temperature Storage

A.P. Medlicott; J.M.M. Sigrist; O. Sy

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
88
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of harvest maturity of mangos (Mangifera indica L.) on storage tinder various low-temperature regimes and the influence of storage on quality development during subsequent ripening at higher temperatures were investigated. The capacity for storage of mango fruit depended on harvest maturity, storage temperature, and the time of harvest within the season. Development of peel and pulp color, soluble solids concentration, pH, and softening in `Amelie', `Tommy Atkins', and `Keitt' mangos occurred progressively during storage for up to 21 days at 12C. Based on the level of ripening change that occurred during 12C storage, immature fruit showed superior storage capacity than fruit harvested at more-advanced stages of physiological maturity. On transfer to ripening temperatures (25C); however, immature fruit failed to develop full ripeness characteristics. Mature and half-mature fruit underwent limited ripening during storage at 12C, the extent of which increased with progressive harvests during the season. Ripening changes during storage for 21 days were less at 8 and 10C than at 12C. Chilling injury, as indicated by inhibition of ripening, was found at all harvest stored at 8C, and in early season harvests stored at 10C. Fruit from mid- and late-season harvests stored better at 10 than at 12C, with no apparent signs of chilling injury. Flavor of mangos ripened after low-temperature storage was less acceptable than of those ripened immediately after harvest. Suggestions are made for maximizing storage potential by controlling harvest maturity and storage temperature for progressive harvests throughout the season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango storage capacity depended on harvest maturity, temperature and harvest timing.

Taxon
mango fruitMangifera indicae0
Treatment
storage temperaturee0
Outcome
capacity for storagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The capacity for storage of mango fruit depended on harvest maturity, storage temperature, and the time of harvest within the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–367 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel and pulp color, soluble solids, pH and softening progressed through 21 days at 12C.

Outcome
peel and pulp color, soluble solids concentration, pH, and softeninge0
Direction
progressivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development of peel and pulp color, soluble solids concentration, pH, and softening in `Amelie', `Tommy Atkins', and `Keitt' mangos occurred progressively during storage for up to 21 days at 12C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immature fruit had better storage capacity than physiologically more mature fruit.

Taxon
fruite0
Outcome
storage capacitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
fruit harvested at more-advanced stages of physiological maturitye0

Verbatim

e0

“immature fruit showed superior storage capacity than fruit harvested at more-advanced stages of physiological maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–755 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immature fruit did not develop full ripeness at 25C after transfer.

Taxon
fruite0
Outcome
failed to develop full ripeness characteristicse0
Qualifier
25Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“On transfer to ripening temperatures (25C); however, immature fruit failed to develop full ripeness characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–872 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature and half-mature fruit ripened to a limited extent at 12C, increasingly with later harvests.

Taxon
fruite0
Outcome
limited ripeninge0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Mature and half-mature fruit underwent limited ripening during storage at 12C, the extent of which increased with progressive harvests during the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening changes over 21 days were lower at 8 and 10C than at 12C.

Treatment
8 and 10Ce0
Outcome
Ripening changese0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
12Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ripening changes during storage for 21 days were less at 8 and 10C than at 12C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 8C caused chilling injury at all harvests.

Outcome
Chilling injurye0
Qualifier
8Ce0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Chilling injury, as indicated by inhibition of ripening, was found at all harvest stored at 8C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early harvests stored at 10C developed chilling injury.

Outcome
early season harvests stored at 10Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in early season harvests stored at 10C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid and late season fruit stored better at 10 than 12C without apparent chilling injury.

Taxon
Fruite0
Treatment
10e0
Outcome
stored bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
12Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit from mid- and late-season harvests stored better at 10 than at 12C, with no apparent signs of chilling injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavor after low temperature storage was less acceptable than flavor after immediate ripening.

Treatment
low-temperature storagee0
Outcome
Flavore0
Direction
less acceptablee0
Comparator
those ripened immediately after harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavor of mangos ripened after low-temperature storage was less acceptable than of those ripened immediately after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1487 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.