Paper · 2019 · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies

Fabrication of Biochar from Organic Wastes andits Effect on Wheat Growth and Soil Microflora

Sadia Aziz; Laiba Yaseen; Asif Jamal; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In modern agricultural practices, applying biochar to improve soil fertility, plant growth and agricultural output is gaining a great deal of attention. Our current study highlights the preparation of biochar from fruit and vegetable waste and nutshell waste and its application as biofertilizer. The prepared biochar from both resources was characterized via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both types of biochar and their mixture were tested in a short-term lab-scale pot experiment at two different rates (0.5%, 1% w/w) in order to evaluate their relative efficacy in soil fertility and wheat yield. Soil parameters like pH, electrical conductivity, total carbon, total nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium were analysed before and after plant growth by standard procedures. At the end of the experiment plant growth and dry biomass was calculated. Analytical characterization of biochar depicts its crystalline nature with the presence of carbon nanotubes and circular pores. Wheat growth effects varied with biochar type, but overall positive growth results were observed for both biochar and their mixture. Results proved that wheat growth and biomass production was highest with maximum concentration of biochar mixture, while the highest microbial count was observed with 1% nutshell biochar. Promising wheat growth and a shift in relative abundance of the microbial community could have resulted from improvement in soil parameters such as highest soil EC of 190 us/cm. Phosphorous and potassium concentrations of 12 mg/kg and 210 mg/kg were observed at 1% mixture of biochar. In 1% fruit and vegetable waste biochar highest TC of 0.459% was observed in soil. Furthermore, the highest TN of 0.0325% was examined at 0.5% mixture of biochar. Our results conclude that the biochar amendment in soil at optimum level improves soil physiochemical properties and enhances soil microflora, which in turn cast a positive influence on soil productivity and crop growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and vegetable waste biochar improved wheat growth.

Treatment
biochar from fruit and vegetable wastee1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat growth effects varied with biochar type, but overall positive growth results were observed for both biochar and their mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar from fruit and vegetable waste and nutshell waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutshell waste biochar improved wheat growth.

Treatment
nutshell wastee1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat growth effects varied with biochar type, but overall positive growth results were observed for both biochar and their mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar from fruit and vegetable waste and nutshell waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biochar mixture improved wheat growth.

Treatment
their mixturee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat growth effects varied with biochar type, but overall positive growth results were observed for both biochar and their mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth and biomass were highest with the maximum biochar mixture concentration.

Treatment
maximum concentration of biochar mixturee0
Outcome
wheat growth and biomass productione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth and biomass production was highest with maximum concentration of biochar mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial count was highest with 1% nutshell biochar in the wheat pot study.

Treatment
1% nutshell biochare0
Outcome
microbial counte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest microbial count was observed with 1% nutshell biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil electrical conductivity reached 190 us/cm in the wheat biochar experiment.

Outcome
soil ECe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
190 us/cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest soil EC of 190 us/cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus was 12 mg/kg with 1% mixed biochar.

Treatment
1% mixture of biochare0
Outcome
Phosphorouse0
Value
12 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorous and potassium concentrations of 12 mg/kg and 210 mg/kg were observed at 1% mixture of biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium was 210 mg/kg with 1% mixed biochar.

Treatment
1% mixture of biochare0
Outcome
potassiume0
Value
210 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorous and potassium concentrations of 12 mg/kg and 210 mg/kg were observed at 1% mixture of biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total carbon was highest at 0.459% with 1% fruit and vegetable waste biochar.

Treatment
1% fruit and vegetable waste biochare0
Outcome
TCe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.459%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1% fruit and vegetable waste biochar highest TC of 0.459% was observed in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total nitrogen was highest at 0.0325% with 0.5% mixed biochar.

Treatment
0.5% mixture of biochare0
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.0325%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest TN of 0.0325% was examined at 0.5% mixture of biochar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biochar had crystalline structure, carbon nanotubes and circular pores.

Outcome
crystalline nature with the presence of carbon nanotubes and circular porese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analytical characterization of biochar depicts its crystalline nature with the presence of carbon nanotubes and circular pores.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.