Paper · 2009 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Abscisic acid improves colour development in ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes in the vineyard and on detached berries

Susan Lurie; Rinat Ovadia; Ada Nissim-Levi; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
42
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary‘Crimson Seedless’ is a high quality, red, table grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar, which may fail to develop adequate red colour in warm climates. In addition, most bunches contain some green berries when the rest of the bunch has become red. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a plant hormone which increases in grape berry skin at the onset of maturation and is involved in the regulation of anthocyanin accumulation. A commercial formulation, S-ABA (ProTone®), was sprayed at 400 mg l−1 or 800 mg l−1 in a vineyard at the beginning of veraison, or 200 mg l−1, 400 mg l−1, or 600 mg l−1 S-ABA was applied to detached berries or to small bunches (five-to-six berries) in the laboratory by spraying or by allowing uptake through the pedicel. In the vineyard, the application of S-ABA affected berry colour, changing the red berry colour of the control [hue angle (h°) = 3.6] to black for S-ABA-treated clusters (h° = –45°). Ripeness parameters (soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and berry size) were not affected by S-ABA treatment, but treated berries were less firm (250 g mm−1) than untreated control fruit (335 g mm−1) using a compression durometer. Anthocyanin accumulation in berries treated with 400 mg l−1 S-ABA was almost double that of control berries, although the anthocyanin compositions were similar. Storage of grapes at 0°C for 3 weeks, with no protection from decay, indicated that S-ABA did not increase their sensitivity to fungal infection. Green or breaker-stage detached berries, or bunches, developed a red colour by spraying with S-ABA or by uptake through the pedicel. Detached berries may therefore serve as an efficient system with which to test the effects of S-ABA and its interactions with other factors which influence colour development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vineyard S-ABA changed berry colour from red control to black treated clusters.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
S-ABAe0
Outcome
berry coloure0
Direction
changinge0
Value
h° = –45°e0
Qualifier
hue angle (h°) = 3.6e0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
vineyarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the vineyard, the application of S-ABA affected berry colour, changing the red berry colour of the control [hue angle (h°) = 3.6] to black for S-ABA-treated clusters (h° = –45°).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-ABA did not affect soluble solids, titratable acidity or berry size.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
S-ABA treatmente0
Outcome
soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and berry sizee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripeness parameters (soluble solids content, titratable acidity, and berry size) were not affected by S-ABA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-ABA treated berries were less firm than untreated fruit, at 250 versus 335 g mm−1.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
firme0
Direction
lesse0
Value
250 g mm−1e0
Qualifier
335 g mm−1e0
Comparator
untreated control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated berries were less firm (250 g mm−1) than untreated control fruit (335 g mm−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 400 mg l−1, S-ABA nearly doubled berry anthocyanin accumulation relative to controls.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
400 mg l−1 S-ABAe0
Outcome
Anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
almost doublee0
Comparator
control berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin accumulation in berries treated with 400 mg l−1 S-ABA was almost double that of control berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-ABA treated berries retained similar anthocyanin compositions to controls.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
400 mg l−1 S-ABAe0
Outcome
anthocyanin compositionse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin accumulation in berries treated with 400 mg l−1 S-ABA was almost double that of control berries, although the anthocyanin compositions were similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-ABA did not increase fungal infection sensitivity after three weeks at 0°C.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
S-ABAe0
Outcome
sensitivity to fungal infectione0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
at 0°C for 3 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage of grapes at 0°C for 3 weeks, with no protection from decay, indicated that S-ABA did not increase their sensitivity to fungal infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1464 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying S-ABA developed red colour in green or breaker-stage detached berries or bunches.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Green or breaker-stage detached berriese0
Treatment
spraying with S-ABAe0
Outcome
developed a red coloure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green or breaker-stage detached berries, or bunches, developed a red colour by spraying with S-ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1563 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-ABA uptake through the pedicel developed red colour in green or breaker-stage detached berries or bunches.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
Green or breaker-stage detached berriese0
Treatment
uptake through the pedicele0
Outcome
developed a red coloure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green or breaker-stage detached berries, or bunches, developed a red colour by spraying with S-ABA or by uptake through the pedicel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1597 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose detached berries as an efficient S-ABA test system.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Outcome
efficient system with which to test the effects of S-ABAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Detached berries may therefore serve as an efficient system with which to test the effects of S-ABA and its interactions with other factors which influence colour development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1773 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–87 · show in text ↑

4-sulfanilamidobenzoic acid · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

4-sulfanilamidobenzoic acid · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

4-sulfanilamidobenzoic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.