Paper · 2019 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Impact of Planting Date on Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Population Dynamics and Grain Sorghum Yield

Nicholas J Seiter; Anne D Miskelley; Gus M Lorenz; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), has become a major pest of grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, in the United States in recent years. Feeding by large densities of sugarcane aphids causes severe damage, which can lead to a total loss of yield in extreme cases. Our objective was to determine the effect of grain sorghum planting date on sugarcane aphid population dynamics and their potential to reduce yields. We conducted field experiments from 2015 to 2017 in which an aphid-susceptible grain sorghum hybrid was planted at four different dates, which encompassed the typical range of planting dates used in Arkansas production systems. Plots were either protected from sugarcane aphid feeding using foliar insecticide sprays, or left untreated to allow natural populations of sugarcane aphids to colonize and reproduce freely. Planting date impacted both the magnitude and severity of sugarcane aphid infestations, with the highest population densities (and subsequent reductions in sorghum yield) generally occurring on plots that were planted in May or June. Sugarcane aphid feeding reduced yields in the untreated plots in two of the four planting date categories we tested. Earlier planting generally resulted in less sugarcane aphid damage and improved yields compared with later planting dates. While the effect of planting date on sugarcane aphid populations is likely to vary by region, sorghum producers should consider grain sorghum planting date as a potential cultural tactic to reduce the impact of sugarcane aphid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May or June planting generally had the highest sugarcane aphid densities.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
planted in May or Junee0
Interactor
sugarcane aphide1pest
Outcome
population densitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest population densities (and subsequent reductions in sorghum yield) generally occurring on plots that were planted in May or June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May or June planting generally had subsequent sorghum yield reductions.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore2
Treatment
planted in May or Junee0
Interactor
sugarcane aphide1pest
Outcome
sorghum yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest population densities (and subsequent reductions in sorghum yield) generally occurring on plots that were planted in May or June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid feeding reduced untreated plot yields in two of four planting date categories.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Sugarcane aphid feedinge0
Interactor
Sugarcane aphide0pest
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
two of the four planting date categoriese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane aphid feeding reduced yields in the untreated plots in two of the four planting date categories we tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting generally reduced aphid damage relative to later planting.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Earlier plantinge0
Interactor
sugarcane aphide0pest
Outcome
sugarcane aphid damagee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
later planting datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earlier planting generally resulted in less sugarcane aphid damage and improved yields compared with later planting dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting generally improved yields relative to later planting.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Earlier plantinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
later planting datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earlier planting generally resulted in less sugarcane aphid damage and improved yields compared with later planting dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Producers should consider planting date to reduce sugarcane aphid impact.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore1
Interactor
sugarcane aphide0pest
Outcome
grain sorghum planting date as a potential cultural tactic to reduce the impact of sugarcane aphide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum producers should consider grain sorghum planting date as a potential cultural tactic to reduce the impact of sugarcane aphid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1582 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–133 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.