Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

Antifungal Activity of Spearmint and Peppermint Essential Oils against Macrophomina Root Rot of Cotton

Fathia El-Shoraky; A. Shala

20
claims
45
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Essential oils as natural antifungal substances one of the alternative methods for plant disease control. The present study was conducted during 2015 and 2016 to investigate the antifungal activity and oil constituents of volatile oils from spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint( Mentha piperita L.) against cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina). Gas chromatographic analysis revealed that spearmint volatile oilwas constituted by carvone (60.16%) as a major component followed by 1,8 cineole (8.67%), limonene (7.40 %), dihydro carvone (5.86 %), β- ocimene (4.29%) and pulegone (3.23%). While peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone (46.52%), menthol (25.88%), limonene (7.72%) menthyl acetate (3.90%), iso menthol (2.10%) and sabinene (2.03%). Both essential oils with different concentrations were evaluated in vitro against three fungus isolates. The two tested oils exhibited 89.55 inhibition percent for the crude oils, against all the tested fungal isolates. Moreover, it was noticed that as oil concentrations decreased, the inhibitory effect also decreased. At the same time, a highly significant effect of oils at all concentrations was observed during sclerotial formation (number and size). The use of essential oils as seed treatment exhibited a highly significant reduction in disease incidence of cotton which has been artificially infested with root rot patho­gen, compared to fungicide and untreated control treat­ments under the greenhouse conditions. This reduction was calculated to be between 4.56 and 100% compared with a 26.67% reduction with the utilization of Topsin M treatment at the pre-emergence stage. At the post-emergence stage, all applied treat­ments were able to decrease the percentage of root-rot incidence. Reduction ranged between 66.67 and 100% over the untreated control. Reduction in disease incidence was reflected in a survival plants increase of 34.62–96.17% and 73.09–126.9% for spearmint and peppermint volatile oils, receptively. Results in the current study demonstrated, that application of peppermint essential oils has an observer influence on the plant growth (plant height), which differ significantly from this of spearmint oil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carvone was the major component of spearmint oil at 60.16%.

Taxon
spearmintMentha spicatae0
Outcome
carvonee0
Direction
major componente0
Value
60.16%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spearmint volatile oilwas constituted by carvone (60.16%) as a major component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–487 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil also contained 1,8 cineole at 8.67%.

Taxon
SpearmintMentha spicatae7
Outcome
1,8 cineolee0
Value
8.67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1,8 cineole (8.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–519 · show in text ↑
e7

“spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil contained limonene at 7.40 %.

Taxon
SpearmintMentha spicatae7
Outcome
limonenee0
Value
7.40 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limonene (7.40 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–538 · show in text ↑
e7

“spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil contained dihydro carvone at 5.86 %.

Taxon
SpearmintMentha spicatae7
Outcome
dihydro carvonee0
Value
5.86 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dihydro carvone (5.86 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–564 · show in text ↑
e7

“spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil contained β- ocimene at 4.29%.

Taxon
SpearmintMentha spicatae7
Outcome
β- ocimenee0
Value
4.29%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β- ocimene (4.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–584 · show in text ↑
e7

“spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil contained pulegone at 3.23%.

Taxon
SpearmintMentha spicatae7
Outcome
pulegonee0
Value
3.23%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha spicata
Mentha spicata · TaxonSimon Eugster -- Simon 13:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulegone (3.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–605 · show in text ↑
e7

“spearmint (Mentha viridis L.)and peppermint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–284 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Menthone was the largest reported component of peppermint oil at 46.52%.

Taxon
peppermintMentha ×piperitae0
Outcome
menthonee0
Direction
riche0
Value
46.52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone (46.52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil contained menthol at 25.88%.

Taxon
PeppermintMentha ×piperitae7
Outcome
menthole0
Value
25.88%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“menthol (25.88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–683 · show in text ↑
e7

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil contained limonene at 7.72%.

Taxon
PeppermintMentha ×piperitae7
Outcome
limonenee0
Value
7.72%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limonene (7.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–701 · show in text ↑
e7

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil contained menthyl acetate at 3.90%.

Taxon
PeppermintMentha ×piperitae7
Outcome
menthyl acetatee0
Value
3.90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“menthyl acetate (3.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–725 · show in text ↑
e7

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil contained iso menthol at 2.10%.

Taxon
PeppermintMentha ×piperitae7
Outcome
iso menthole0
Value
2.10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“iso menthol (2.10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–746 · show in text ↑
e7

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil contained sabinene at 2.03%.

Taxon
PeppermintMentha ×piperitae7
Outcome
sabinenee0
Value
2.03%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mentha x piperita
Mentha ×piperita · TaxonOwn work · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sabinene (2.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–767 · show in text ↑
e7

“peppermint volatile oilwas rich in menthone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude mint oils inhibited all tested Macrophomina isolates by 89.55 percent in vitro.

Treatment
crude oilse0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
inhibition percente0
Value
89.55e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two tested oils exhibited 89.55 inhibition percent for the crude oils, against all the tested fungal isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower oil concentration reduced inhibition of the pathogen.

Treatment
oil concentrationse0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as oil concentrations decreased, the inhibitory effect also decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatments significantly affected pathogen sclerotial number and size.

Treatment
oils at all concentrationse0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
sclerotial formation (number and size)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a highly significant effect of oils at all concentrations was observed during sclerotial formation (number and size)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil seed treatment significantly reduced cotton disease incidence relative to fungicide and untreated controls.

Treatment
essential oils as seed treatmente0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
fungicide and untreated control treat­mentse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of essential oils as seed treatment exhibited a highly significant reduction in disease incidence of cotton which has been artificially infested with root rot patho­gen, compared to fungicide and untreated control treat­ments under the greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At pre-emergence, oil treatments reduced disease by 4.56 to 100%.

Organ / stage
pre-emergence stagee0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4.56 and 100%e0
Qualifier
26.67%e0
Comparator
Topsin M treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduction was calculated to be between 4.56 and 100% compared with a 26.67% reduction with the utilization of Topsin M treatment at the pre-emergence stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence treatments reduced root rot incidence by 66.67 to 100% versus untreated control.

Organ / stage
post-emergence stagee0
Treatment
all applied treat­mentse0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
percentage of root-rot incidencee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
66.67 and 100%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the post-emergence stage, all applied treat­ments were able to decrease the percentage of root-rot incidence. Reduction ranged between 66.67 and 100% over the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearmint oil increased cotton plant survival by 34.62–96.17%.

Treatment
spearminte0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
survival plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
34.62–96.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“survival plants increase of 34.62–96.17% and 73.09–126.9% for spearmint and peppermint volatile oils, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil increased cotton plant survival by 73.09–126.9%.

Treatment
peppermint volatile oilse0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
Outcome
survival plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
73.09–126.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“survival plants increase of 34.62–96.17% and 73.09–126.9% for spearmint and peppermint volatile oils, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root Rot of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton root rot pathogen (Macrophomina phaseolina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–364 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · Macrophomina phaseolina · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.