Paper · 2018

Effects of different rootstocks on plant growth, development and yield of grafted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.).

Darli Wai Soe; Zar Zar Win; Aye Aye Thwe; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was undertaken at the Department of Horticulture and Agricultural Biotechnology, Yezin Agricul-tural University from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate the effects of different rootstocks on the performance of grafted tomato and to determine the suitable rootstock for tomato production. Three rootstocks of local varieties: eggplant (Khayan pa dae tha - ခရမ်းပဒေသာ), tomato (Kyaught Me Gaung Sein- ဒကျောက်မဲဒခါင်းစိမ်း) and hot pepper (Yemethin Moe Htaung- ရမည်းသင်းမိုးဒောင်) were grafted with commercial tomato cultivar (Platinum 701). Results indicated that all tested local type rootstocks are suitable for tomato production since the grafting success rate is over 70%. Leaf emergence rate (Plastochron day-1) was faster and plants were taller in the grafted plants than non-grafted plants. Increased photosynthesis efficiency with higher chlorophyll content leads to enhanced plant growth and reproductive developments of the grafted tomato (0.81 and 58.7) compared with the non-grafted tomato (0.75 and 52.3). Marketable yields were also higher in the grafted tomato (4146.1 g plant-1) than non-grafted tomato (2491.7 g plant-1). Among the grafted plants, those on eggplant rootstock produced the highest marketable fruit yield (5071.4g plant-1) followed by the ones on local tomato rootstock (3894.3 g plant-1) and local hot pepper rootstock (3472.6 g plant-1). Non-grafted plants showed the lowest marketable yield (2491.7g plant-1). These results suggested that graft-ing on suitable rootstock has positive effects on plant growth and fruit yield of tomato and local eggplant rootstock was the most suitable for tomato grafting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting success rate was over 70% for the tested local rootstocks.

Material
local type rootstockse1
Outcome
grafting success ratee1
Value
over 70%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results indicated that all tested local type rootstocks are suitable for tomato production since the grafting success rate is over 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–674 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

All tested local type rootstocks are suitable for tomato production.

Outcome
all tested local type rootstocks are suitable for tomato productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results indicated that all tested local type rootstocks are suitable for tomato production since the grafting success rate is over 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato plants had faster leaf emergence than non-grafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse2
Outcome
Leaf emergence ratee2
Direction
fastere2
Comparator
non-grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf emergence rate (Plastochron day-1) was faster and plants were taller in the grafted plants than non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato plants were taller than non-grafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse2
Outcome
plants were tallere2
Direction
tallere2
Comparator
non-grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf emergence rate (Plastochron day-1) was faster and plants were taller in the grafted plants than non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased photosynthesis efficiency with higher chlorophyll content leads to enhanced plant growth and reproductive development of tomato.

Outcome
plant growth and reproductive developmentse3
Qualifier
Increased photosynthesis efficiency with higher chlorophyll contente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Increased photosynthesis efficiency with higher chlorophyll content leads to enhanced plant growth and reproductive developments of the grafted tomato (0.81 and 58.7) compared with the non-grafted tomato (0.75 and 52.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting enhanced plant growth and reproductive development of tomato (0.81 and 58.7 against 0.75 and 52.3 for non-grafted).

Treatment
graftede3
Outcome
plant growth and reproductive developmentse3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
0.81 and 58.7e3
Qualifier
0.75 and 52.3e3
Comparator
non-grafted tomatoe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Increased photosynthesis efficiency with higher chlorophyll content leads to enhanced plant growth and reproductive developments of the grafted tomato (0.81 and 58.7) compared with the non-grafted tomato (0.75 and 52.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato had higher marketable yield than non-grafted tomato.

Treatment
graftede4
Outcome
Marketable yieldse4
Direction
highere4
Value
4146.1 g plant-1e4
Qualifier
2491.7 g plant-1e4
Comparator
non-grafted tomatoe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Marketable yields were also higher in the grafted tomato (4146.1 g plant-1) than non-grafted tomato (2491.7 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eggplant rootstock gave the highest marketable fruit yield among grafted plants.

Treatment
eggplant rootstocke5
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
5071.4g plant-1e5
Qualifier
3894.3 g plant-1e5
Comparator
local tomato rootstocke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“those on eggplant rootstock produced the highest marketable fruit yield (5071.4g plant-1) followed by the ones on local tomato rootstock (3894.3 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1319 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Local eggplant rootstock is the most suitable rootstock for tomato grafting.

Outcome
local eggplant rootstocke6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“local eggplant rootstock was the most suitable for tomato grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1638 · show in text ↑

Solanum melongena · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

53 papers: 43 positive, 10 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

grafting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.