Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Trichoderma erinaceum Bio-Priming Modulates the WRKYs Defense Programming in Tomato Against the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) Challenged Condition

Mohd Aamir; Sarvesh Pratap Kashyap; Andleeb Zehra; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
83
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The beneficial association and interaction of rhizocompetent microorganism are widely used for plant biofertilization and amelioration of stress-induced damages in plants. To explore the regulatory mechanism involved in plant defense while associating with beneficial microbial species, and their interplay when co-inoculated with pathogen, we evaluated the response of tomato defense-related WRKY gene transcripts. The present study was carried out to examine the qRT–PCR-based relative quantification of differently expressed defence-related genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.; variety S-22) primed with Trichoderma erinaceum against the vascular wilt pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici). The tissue specific and time bound expression profile changes revealed highest upregulation was observed in transcript profile of SlWRKY31(root) and SlWRKY37(leaf) in T. erinaceum bioprimed treated plants at 24 hrs with 16.51- and 14.07- fold increase respectively. In contrast, SlWRKY4 showed downregulation with highest repression in T.erinaceum bioprimed root (24 hrs) and leaf (48 hrs) tissue samples with 0.03 and 0.08 fold decrease respectively. Qualitative expression of PR proteins (chitinases and glucanases) was found elicited in T.erinaceum primed plants. However, the antioxidative activity of tomato Superoxide dismutase and catalase increased with highest upregulation of SOD and GPX1 in Fol+ T.erinaceum treatments. We observed that these expression changes were accompanied by 32.06% lesser H2O2 production in T. erinaceum bioprimed samples. The aggravated defense response in all the treated conditions was also reflected by an increased lignified tissue. Overall, we conclude that T. erinaceum biopriming modulated the defense transcriptome of tomato following the Fol challenged conditions, and were accompanied by enhanced accumulation of defense-related WRKY transcripts, increased antioxidative enzyme activities and the reinforcements through a higher number of lignified cell layers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlWRKY31 root transcripts increased 16.51-fold at 24 hours in T. erinaceum-bioprimed tomato.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
T. erinaceum bioprimede0
Interactor
T. erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
SlWRKY31e0
Outcome
transcript profilee0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
16.51-e0
Qualifier
24 hrse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest upregulation was observed in transcript profile of SlWRKY31(root) and SlWRKY37(leaf) in T. erinaceum bioprimed treated plants at 24 hrs with 16.51- and 14.07- fold increase respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlWRKY37 leaf transcripts increased 14.07-fold at 24 hours in T. erinaceum-bioprimed tomato.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
T. erinaceum bioprimede0
Interactor
T. erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
SlWRKY37e0
Outcome
transcript profilee0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
14.07- folde0
Qualifier
24 hrse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest upregulation was observed in transcript profile of SlWRKY31(root) and SlWRKY37(leaf) in T. erinaceum bioprimed treated plants at 24 hrs with 16.51- and 14.07- fold increase respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlWRKY4 showed its greatest repression in bioprimed roots at 24 hours, with a 0.03-fold decrease.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
T.erinaceum bioprimede0
Interactor
T.erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
SlWRKY4e0
Outcome
repressione0
Direction
downregulatione0
Value
0.03e0
Qualifier
24 hrse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlWRKY4 showed downregulation with highest repression in T.erinaceum bioprimed root (24 hrs) and leaf (48 hrs) tissue samples with 0.03 and 0.08 fold decrease respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlWRKY4 showed its greatest repression in bioprimed leaves at 48 hours, with a 0.08-fold decrease.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
T.erinaceum bioprimede0
Interactor
T.erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
SlWRKY4e0
Outcome
repressione0
Direction
downregulatione0
Value
0.08 folde0
Qualifier
48 hrse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlWRKY4 showed downregulation with highest repression in T.erinaceum bioprimed root (24 hrs) and leaf (48 hrs) tissue samples with 0.03 and 0.08 fold decrease respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming elicited qualitative expression of chitinases and glucanases in tomato.

Treatment
T.erinaceum primede0
Interactor
T.erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
PR proteins (chitinases and glucanases)e0
Outcome
Qualitative expressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Qualitative expression of PR proteins (chitinases and glucanases) was found elicited in T.erinaceum primed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato superoxide dismutase and catalase antioxidative activity increased.

Treatment
T.erinaceum primede1
Interactor
T.erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume1biocontrol_agent
Gene
Superoxide dismutase and catalasee0
Outcome
antioxidative activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antioxidative activity of tomato Superoxide dismutase and catalase increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“T.erinaceum primed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD and GPX1 showed highest upregulation with combined Fol and T.erinaceum treatment.

Treatment
Fol+ T.erinaceum treatmentse0
Interactor
Fole0pathogen
Second interactor
T.erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Gene
SOD and GPX1e0
Outcome
upregulatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest upregulation of SOD and GPX1 in Fol+ T.erinaceum treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioprimed tomato samples produced 32.06% less H2O2.

Treatment
T. erinaceum bioprimede0
Interactor
T. erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
H2O2 productione0
Direction
lessere0
Value
32.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“32.06% lesser H2O2 production in T. erinaceum bioprimed samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treated tomato conditions showed increased lignified tissue and more lignified cell layers.

Treatment
all the treated conditionse0
Outcome
lignified tissuee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
a higher number of lignified cell layerse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aggravated defense response in all the treated conditions was also reflected by an increased lignified tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1680 · show in text ↑
e1

“a higher number of lignified cell layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that T. erinaceum biopriming modulates tomato defense transcripts following Fol challenge.

Treatment
T. erinaceum biopriminge0
Interactor
Fole0pathogen
Second interactor
T. erinaceumTrichoderma erinaceume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
defense transcriptomee0
Qualifier
following the Fol challenged conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. erinaceum biopriming modulated the defense transcriptome of tomato following the Fol challenged conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1817 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.