Paper · 2015 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF FARM YARD MANURE AND SELENIUM ON WHEAT YIELD AND GRAIN QUALITY UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS.

A. Khatab; M. Elkholy; S. El-Tohamy

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out on a private farm at Sidi Barrani, Marsa Matrouh Governorate during two successive seasons of (2011/2012 and 2012/2013) to study the integrated effect of organic manure (farm yard manure, FYM) as an organic soil amendment and selenium on wheat yield (variety Giza 168) and grain quality. Farm yard manure (FYM) was applied at three rates of 0, 2 and 4 ton fed-1, while selenium was added at the rates of 0, 5,15 and 25 g fed-1. The main plots were occupied with the applied FYM rates, mean while the added selenium rates were arranged among the sub-plots, and then each treatment was replicated three times. The plot area was 18 m2 (3 × 6 m).The obtained results showed that the applied different FYM and selenium rates exhibited a significantly ameliorated for each of the studied wheat plant parameters (i.e., plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weight) and harvest stages (i.e., biological yield of grain plus straw yields and their contents of N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and Se) as well as grain quality (i.e., 1000 grain weight, grain contents of protein, carbohydrates and sugar fractions).From the economical point of view, the results of this study showed that the integrated effect of the combined treatment of (4 ton FYM/fed+15g selenium/fed) was recorded best values for all the aforementioned plant parameters, taking into consideration the possible adverse fears of human health through environmental risks as a result of the excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers and selenium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied FYM and selenium rates significantly improved wheat growth and yield traits.

Treatment
different FYM and selenium ratese0
Outcome
plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weighte0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the applied different FYM and selenium rates exhibited a significantly ameliorated for each of the studied wheat plant parameters (i.e., plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weight) and harvest stages (i.e., biological yield of grain plus straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied FYM and selenium rates significantly improved grain and straw yield.

Treatment
different FYM and selenium ratese0
Outcome
biological yield of grain plus straw yieldse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the applied different FYM and selenium rates exhibited a significantly ameliorated for each of the studied wheat plant parameters (i.e., plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weight) and harvest stages (i.e., biological yield of grain plus straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied FYM and selenium rates significantly improved harvest nutrient contents.

Treatment
different FYM and selenium ratese0
Outcome
contents of N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and See0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the applied different FYM and selenium rates exhibited a significantly ameliorated for each of the studied wheat plant parameters (i.e., plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weight) and harvest stages (i.e., biological yield of grain plus straw yields and their contents of N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and Se)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied FYM and selenium rates significantly improved grain quality traits.

Treatment
different FYM and selenium ratese0
Outcome
grain contents of protein, carbohydrates and sugar fractionse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the applied different FYM and selenium rates exhibited a significantly ameliorated for each of the studied wheat plant parameters (i.e., plant height, No and length of spike, kernels number and weight) and harvest stages (i.e., biological yield of grain plus straw yields and their contents of N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and Se) as well as grain quality (i.e., 1000 grain weight, grain contents of protein, carbohydrates and sugar fractions)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 4 ton FYM/fed and 15g selenium/fed treatment gave the best values across studied parameters.

Treatment
4 ton FYM/fed+15g selenium/fede0
Outcome
plant parameterse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined treatment of (4 ton FYM/fed+15g selenium/fed) was recorded best values for all the aforementioned plant parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1374 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

selenium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

selenium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.