Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Science and Biotechnology

Balance among calcium, magnesium and potassium levels affecting Asian Soybean Rust severity

Guilherme Garcia Gaspar; Hideaki Wilson Takahashi; Marcelo Giovanetti Canteri; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This work aimed to analyze the effect of the variation of the proportions of calcium in relation to the contentes of magnesium and potassium in the cationic capacity of change (CCC) of the soil, seeking to propitiate the appropriate balance of bases, so that the soybean plants presented good nutritional state and had conditions of resisting to the attack of Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd. The experiment was driven in randomized blocks with eight replications and the treatments consisted of doses of Ca:Mg:K in relation to CCC of the soil being:1) without correction of the bases (original soil with 3,8%:6,6%:2,4%); 2) 35:15:5; 3) 45:15:5; 4) 55:15:5; 5) 65:15:5; 6) 75:15:5. The soybean cultivar used in the experiment was BRS 184, sowed in mud vases containing dystrophic Red Latosol (Oxisol) as substrate. The inoculation was realized in the fenologic stadium V4. The disease severity was determined through visual notes considering the percentage foliate area with visible symptoms of the disease, being calculated the Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC). The data were submitted to the variance analysis (p<0.05) and fitting to regression models. The balance among the nutrientes was analyzed being calculated the index DRIS. The contents of nutrients, the matter dry indexes (MDI) and nutritional balance index (NBI) were inserted in the program ChecarDris for obtaining of the index DRIS. The results appeared that the percentages of 55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassium, increase larger nutritional balance in the soybean providing to smallest area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), reduction in the severity of the rust (%), besides increase the largest productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A soil Ca:Mg:K proportion of 55%:15%:5% gave larger nutritional balance in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassiume0
Outcome
nutritional balancee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentages of 55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassium, increase larger nutritional balance in the soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 55%:15%:5% Ca:Mg:K proportion gave the smallest AUDPC and reduced soybean rust severity.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassiume1
Interactor
Phakopsora pachyrhiziPhakopsora pachyrhizie3pathogen
Outcome
area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), reduction in the severity of the ruste2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1509 · show in text ↑
e2

“smallest area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), reduction in the severity of the rust (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“Phakopsora pachyrhizi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 55%:15%:5% Ca:Mg:K proportion increased soybean productivity to the largest value.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassiume1
Outcome
productivitye4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“55% of calcium, 15% of magnesium and 5% of potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1509 · show in text ↑
e4

“increase the largest productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

potassium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

149 papers: 123 positive, 26 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

potassium · Phakopsora pachyrhizi · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.